首页> 外文期刊>Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine >Clinical effectiveness of lifestyle management programs: Importance of the class effect paradox
【24h】

Clinical effectiveness of lifestyle management programs: Importance of the class effect paradox

机译:生活方式管理计划的临床有效性:班级效应悖论的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Opinion Statement: It is well appreciated in pharmacotherapy that all drugs belonging to the same class of agents are not necessarily equally safe or effective. Because of this so-called "class effect paradox," pharmaceutical companies must do extensive research to prove the safety and efficacy of a new drug before introducing it into the market, even if it belongs to a well-established class of medications. Like pharmaceutical agents, lifestyle management interventions can be organized into classes. This commentary examines the rationale for, and importance of, considering the class effect paradox when balancing the need for new and innovative lifestyle management programs with the need for evidence-based interventions with proven outcomes. In view of the fact that all lifestyle management programs within a specific broad intervention class do not necessarily result in clinical benefit, it is recommended that any new approach should not be widely implemented until it has been shown to be effective as evidenced by results of clinical studies published in peer-reviewed journals.
机译:意见书:在药物疗法中,所有属于同一类药物的药物不一定都同样安全或有效。由于这种所谓的“类效应悖论”,制药公司必须进行广泛的研究,以证明新药在投放市场之前,即使它属于公认的药物类别,其安全性和有效性。像药剂师一样,生活方式管理干预措施可以组织为类。该评论探讨了在平衡对新型和创新性生活方式管理计划的需求与对基于证据的干预措施以及具有可靠结果的需求之间进行考虑时,考虑阶级效应悖论的理由和重要性。鉴于特定的广泛干预类别中的所有生活方式管理计划不一定带来临床益处,因此建议不要广泛实施任何新方法,直到临床结果证明该新方法有效为止在同行评审期刊上发表的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号