首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Lansoprazole for children with poorly controlled asthma: a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Lansoprazole for children with poorly controlled asthma: a randomized controlled trial.

机译:哮喘患儿儿童的兰辛唑:随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Asymptomatic gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is prevalent in children with asthma. Untreated GER has been postulated to be a cause of inadequate asthma control in children despite inhaled corticosteroid treatment, but it is not known whether treatment with proton pump inhibitors improves asthma control. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether lansoprazole is effective in reducing asthma symptoms in children without overt GER. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Study of Acid Reflux in Children With Asthma, a randomized, masked, placebo-controlled, parallel clinical trial that compared lansoprazole with placebo in children with poor asthma control who were receiving inhaled corticosteroid treatment. Three hundred six participants enrolled from April 2007 to September 2010 at 19 US academic clinical centers were followed up for 24 weeks. A subgroup had an esophageal pH study before randomization. INTERVENTION: Participating children were randomly assigned to receive either lansoprazole, 15 mg/d if weighing less than 30 kg or 30 mg/d if weighing 30 kg or more (n = 149), or placebo (n = 157). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score (range, 0-6; a 0.5-unit change is considered clinically meaningful). Secondary outcome measures included lung function measures, asthma-related quality of life, and episodes of poor asthma control. RESULTS: The mean age was 11 years (SD, 3 years). The mean difference in change (lansoprazole minus placebo) in the ACQ score was 0.2 units (95% CI, 0.0-0.3 units). There were no statistically significant differences in the mean difference in change for the secondary outcomes of forced expiratory volume in the first second (0.0 L; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.1 L), asthma-related quality of life (-0.1; 95% CI, -0.3 to 0.1), or rate of episodes of poor asthma control (relative risk, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5). Among the 115 children with esophageal pH studies, the prevalence of GER was 43%. In the subgroup with a positive pH study, no treatment effect for lansoprazole vs placebo was observed for any asthma outcome. Children treated with lansoprazole reported more respiratory infections (relative risk, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.1-1.6]). CONCLUSION: In this trial of children with poorly controlled asthma without symptoms of GER who were using inhaled corticosteroids, the addition of lansoprazole, compared with placebo, improved neither symptoms nor lung function but was associated with increased adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00442013.
机译:背景:无症状胃食管反流(GER)在哮喘的儿童中普遍存在。由于吸入皮质类固醇治疗,未经治疗的GER被假设是儿童哮喘控制不足的原因,但不知道用质子泵抑制剂治疗是否改善了哮喘控制。目的:判断兰萨拉唑是否有效减少儿童哮喘症状,没有公开GER。设计,设定和参与者:哮喘儿童酸反流,随机,蒙皮,安慰剂控制,并行临床试验,将Lansopro患者与受吸入皮质类固醇治疗的哮喘控制患儿的安慰剂与安慰剂进行比较。从2007年4月到2010年4月19日美国学术临床中心的三百六名参与者随访24周。在随机化之前,亚组进行食管pH研究。干预:如果体重30kg或更高(n = 149)或安慰剂(n = 157),则随机分配参与儿童接受兰辛拉唑,15mg / d,如果体重低于30kg或30mg / d。主要结果措施:哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)评分(范围0-6; 0.5单位变化被认为是临床有意义)的哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)的变化。二次结果措施包括肺功能措施,哮喘相关的生活质量,以及哮喘控制的剧集。结果:平均年龄为11年(SD,3年)。 ACQ评分中的变化(Lansoprazole Minus Placebo)的平均差异为0.2单位(95%CI,0.0-0.3单位)。在第一秒(0.0L; 95%CI,-0.1至0.1L),哮喘相关的寿命(-0.1; 95)中,强制呼气量的二次结果的变化变化的平均差异没有统计学意义%CI,-0.3至0.1),或哮喘控制差的发作率(相对风险,1.2; 95%CI,0.9-1.5)。在食管pH研究的115名儿童中,GER的患病率为43%。在具有阳性pH研究的亚组中,对于任何哮喘结果,没有观察到Lansoprazole与安慰剂的治疗效果。用LansoLazole治疗的儿童报告了更多的呼吸道感染(相对风险,1.3 [95%CI,1.1-1.6])。结论:在这种哮喘患儿的儿童试验中,没有使用吸入皮质类固醇的GER症状,与安慰剂相比,加入LansoLazole,既不改善症状也没有肺功能,但与增加的不良事件有关。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00442013。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号