...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Science and Technology >Removal efficiency of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria using a natural coagulant during coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation processes
【24h】

Removal efficiency of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria using a natural coagulant during coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation processes

机译:在凝血,絮凝和沉降过程中使用天然凝血剂去除革兰氏阳性和革兰阴性细菌的效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Staphylococcus sp. as Gram-positive and Escherichia coli as Gram-negative are bacterial pathogens and can cause primary bloodstream infections and food poisoning. Coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation processes could be a reliable treatment for bacterial removal because suspended, colloidal, and soluble particles can be removed. Chemical coagulants, such as alum, are commonly used. However, these chemical coagulants are not environmentally friendly. This present study evaluated the effectiveness of coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation processes for removing Staphylococcus sp. and E. coli using diatomite with standard jar test equipment at different pH values. Staphylococcus sp. demonstrated 85.61% and 77.23% significant removal in diatomite and alum, respectively, at pH 5. At pH 7, the removal efficiency decreased to 79.41% and 64.13% for Staphylococcus sp. and E. coli, respectively. At pH 9, there was a decrease in Staphylococcus sp. after adding diatomite or alum compared with that of E. coli. The different removal efficiencies of the Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria could be owing to the membrane composition and different structures in the bacteria. This study indicates that diatomite has higher efficiency in removing bacteria at pH 5 and can be considered as a potential coagulant to replace alum for removing bacteria by the coagulation process.
机译:Staphylococcus sp。作为革兰氏阳性和大肠杆菌,作为革兰氏阴性的细菌病原体,可导致原发性血流感染和食物中毒。凝血,絮凝和沉降过程可以是可靠的细菌去除治疗,因为悬浮的胶体和可溶性颗粒可以被除去。通常使用化学凝结剂,例如明矾。然而,这些化学凝结剂不对环保。本研究评估了除去葡萄球菌SP的凝血,絮凝和沉降过程的有效性。和在不同pH值的标准罐测试设备中使用硅藻土的大肠杆菌。 Staphylococcus sp。在pH7处分别在硅藻土和明矾中展示了85.61%和77.23%,在pH7处,去除效率降至葡萄球菌SP的79.41%和64.13%。和大肠杆菌分别。在pH9,葡萄球菌SP减少。与大肠杆菌相比加入硅藻土或alum后。革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细菌的不同除去效率可能是由于膜组成和细菌中的不同结构。该研究表明,硅藻土在pH5下除去细菌的效率较高,并且可以被认为是通过凝血方法替代用于除去细菌的潜在凝结剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号