...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quantitative 20-year synopsis and a network meta-analysis.
【24h】

Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quantitative 20-year synopsis and a network meta-analysis.

机译:非急性冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉干预:定量20年概要和网络荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Over the past 20 years, percutaneous transluminal balloon coronary angioplasty (PTCA), bare-metal stents (BMS), and drug-eluting stents (DES) succeeded each other as catheter-based treatments for coronary artery disease. We undertook a systematic overview of randomised trials comparing these interventions with each other and with medical therapy in patients with non-acute coronary artery disease. METHODS: We searched Medline for trials contrasting at least two of the four interventions (PTCA, BMS, DES, and medical therapy). Eligible outcomes were death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, target lesion or vessel revascularisation, and any revascularisation. Random effects meta-analyses summarised head-to-head (direct) comparisons, and network meta-analyses integrated direct and indirect evidence. FINDINGS: 61 eligible trials (25 388 patients) investigated four of six possible comparisons between the four interventions; no trials directly compared DES with medical therapy or PTCA. In all direct or indirect comparisons, succeeding advancements in percutaneous coronary intervention did not produce detectable improvements in deaths or myocardial infarction. The risk ratio (RR) for indirect comparisons between DES and medical therapy was 0.96 (95% CI 0.60-1.52) for death and 1.15 (0.73-1.82) for myocardial infarction. By contrast, we recorded sequential significant reductions in target lesion or vessel revascularisation with BMS compared with PTCA (RR 0.68 [0-60.0.77]) and with DES compared with BMS (0.44 [0.35-0.56]). The RR for the indirect comparison between DES and PTCA for target lesion or vessel revascularisation was 0.30 (0.17-0.51). INTERPRETATION: Sequential innovations in the catheter-based treatment of non-acute coronary artery disease showed no evidence of an effect on death or myocardial infarction when compared with medical therapy. These results lend support to present recommendations to optimise medical therapy as an initial management strategy in patients with this disease.
机译:背景:在过去20年中,经皮腔气球冠状动脉血管成形术(PTCA),裸金属支架(BMS)和药物洗脱支架(DES)彼此成功地作为基于导管的冠状动脉疾病治疗。我们对随机试验进行了系统概述,将这些干预措施与非急性冠状动脉疾病的患者相互比较。方法:我们搜查了Medline进行试验,对比四种干预措施中的至少两个(PTCA,BMS,DES和医疗治疗)对比。符合条件的结果是死亡,心肌梗死,冠状动脉旁路接枝,靶病变或血管血流性,以及任何血运重建。随机效应元分析总结了头部到头(直接)比较,网络元分析综合直接和间接证据。调查结果:61符合条件的试验(2588名患者)在四种干预措施之间调查了四种可能的比较;没有试验直接与医疗疗法或PTCA进行DES。在所有直接或间接的比较中,经皮冠状动脉干预的成功进步并未产生死亡或心肌梗死的可检测改善。 DES和医疗疗法间间接比较的风险比(RR)为50.96(95%CI 0.60-1.52),用于心肌梗死的1.15(0.73-1.82)。相比之下,与PTCA(RR 0.68 [0-60.0.77])和与BMS相比(0.44 [0.35-0.56]相比,我们记录了对靶病变或血管血运重建的序列显着降低了BMS(0.44 [0.44 [0.35-0.56])。用于靶病变或血管血管体外的DES和PTCA之间间接比较的RR为0.30(0.17-0.51)。解释:与医疗治疗相比,非急性冠状动脉疾病的导管基础治疗的顺序创新显示出对死亡或心肌梗死的影响。这些结果支持提出提出的建议,以优化医疗治疗作为这种疾病患者的初始管理策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号