...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial
【24h】

Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial

机译:展示血栓切除术与支架猎犬血栓切除术作为大容器闭塞的一线方法:多期,随机,开放标签,盲化结果,非劣级试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Stent retriever thrombectomy of large-vessel occlusion results in better outcomes than medical therapy alone. Alternative thrombectomy strategies, particularly a direct aspiration as first pass technique, while promising, have not been rigorously assessed for clinical efficacy in randomised trials. We designed COMPASS to assess whether patients treated with aspiration as first pass have non-inferior functional outcomes to those treated with a stent retriever as first line.
机译:背景技术大容器闭塞的支架猎犬血栓切除术导致单独的医疗治疗的更好的结果。 替代血液切除术策略,特别是作为第一通行技术的直接吸入,同时有前途,尚未严格评估随机试验中的临床疗效。 我们设计了指南针,以评估患者是否具有愿望作为第一通道的患者对那些用支架猎犬作为第一线处理的人具有非较低功能的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号