...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Chemical Physics >Nonadiabatic transition probabilities in a time-dependent Gaussian pulse or plateau pulse: Toward experimental tests of the differences from Dirac's transition probabilities
【24h】

Nonadiabatic transition probabilities in a time-dependent Gaussian pulse or plateau pulse: Toward experimental tests of the differences from Dirac's transition probabilities

机译:在时间依赖的高斯脉冲或平台脉冲中的非抗原过渡概率:朝着与DIRAC过渡概率的差异的实验测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For a quantum system subject to a time-dependent perturbing field, Dirac's analysis gives the probability of transition to an excited state |k in terms of the norm square of the entire excited-state coefficient ck(t) in the wave function. By integrating by parts in Dirac's equation for c(k)(t) at first order, Landau and Lifshitz separated c(k) ((1))(t) into an adiabatic term a(k) ((1))(t) that characterizes the gradual adjustment of the ground state to the perturbation without transitions and a nonadiabatic term b(k) ((1))(t) that depends explicitly on the time derivative of the perturbation at times t' = t. Landau and Lifshitz stated that the probability of transition in a pulsed perturbation is given by |b(k)(t)|(2), rather than by |c(k)(t)|(2). We use the term "transition probability" to refer to the probability that a true excited-state component is present in the time-evolved wave function, as opposed to a smooth modification of the initial state. In recent work, we have examined the differences between |b(k)(t)|(2) and |c(k)(t)|(2) when a system is perturbed by a harmonic wave in a Gaussian envelope. We showed that significant differences exist when the frequency of the harmonic wave is off-resonance with the transition frequency. In this paper, we consider Gaussian perturbations and pulses that rise via a half Gaussian shoulder to a level plateau and later return to zero via a down-going half Gaussian. While the perturbation is constant, the transition probability |b(k)(t)|(2) does not change. By contrast, |c(k)(t)|(2) continues to oscillate while the perturbation is constant, and its time averaged value differs from |b(k)(t)|(2). We suggest a general type of experiment to prove that the transition probability is given by |b(k)(t)|(2), not |c(k)(t)|(2). We propose a ratio test that does not require accurate knowledge of transition matrix elements or absolute field intensities. Published by AIP Publishing.
机译:对于经过时间依赖于时间的扰动场的量子系统,DIRAC的分析使得过渡到激发态的概率K>就波函数中的整个激发状态系数CK(T)的规范平方来说。通过在一定顺序的狄拉克(k)(t)的迪拉克方程中的部分与第一阶的部分集成,Landau和Lifshitz分离的C(k)((1))(t)成绝热术语A(k)((1))(t )表征在没有转变的情况下对扰动的逐渐调节接地状态和非等族B(k)((1))(t),其在明确地在时间t'= t的扰动的时间衍生衍生物。 Landau和Lifshitz表示,在脉冲扰动中过渡的概率由| B(k)(t)|(2),而不是通过| c(k)(t)(2)给出。我们使用术语“转换概率”来指代真正的激发状态分量存在于时间进化波函数中的概率,而不是对初始状态的平滑修改。在最近的工作中,当系统被高斯信封中的谐波扰动时,我们研究了在系统被扰动时的B(k)(t)|(2)和C(2)之间的差异。我们表明,当谐波波的频率与转换频率偏离共振时,存在显着的差异。在本文中,我们考虑通过半高斯肩部到达水平高度的高斯扰动和脉冲,并通过下降的半高斯返回零。虽然扰动是恒定的,但过渡概率| b(k)(t)|(2)不会改变。相比之下,在扰动恒定的同时继续振荡,而其时间平均值不同于| B(k)(t)|(2)。我们建议一般类型的实验,证明过渡概率由| B(k)(t)(2),不是| c(k)(t)|(2)。我们提出了一个不需要准确了解转换矩阵元素或绝对场强度的比率测试。通过AIP发布发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号