首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Randomized controlled study of intraincisional infiltration versus intraperitoneal instillation of standardized dose of ropivacaine 0.2% in post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain: Do we really need high doses of local anesthetics-time to rethink!
【24h】

Randomized controlled study of intraincisional infiltration versus intraperitoneal instillation of standardized dose of ropivacaine 0.2% in post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain: Do we really need high doses of local anesthetics-time to rethink!

机译:随机对照研究腹腔内渗透与腹腔镜胆囊切除术疼痛中标准化剂量的标准化剂量的腹腔内滴注:我们真的需要高剂量的局部麻醉剂时间来重新思考!

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Earlier studies done to compare the efficacy of use of local anesthetics at intraperitoneal location versus intraincisional use had utilized equal amount of drugs at the two locations, usually 10-20 ml. Using this large amount of drug in the small space of intraincisional location as compared to similar amount of drug in large intraperitoneal space created an inadvertent bias in favor of patients receiving the drug intraincisionally so these patients naturally experienced less pain.
机译:早期的研究进行比较在腹膜内定位对局部麻醉剂使用局部麻醉剂的疗效相比,在两个地点使用相同的药物,通常是10-20毫升。 使用这种大量药物在颈内位置的小空间相比,与腹膜内的相似的药物相比,腹膜内的含量产生了无意的偏见,有利于接受药物的患者,所以这些患者自然疼痛较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号