首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Comparison of Patient-reported Outcomes After External Beam Radiation Therapy and Combined External Beam With Low-dose-rate Brachytherapy Boost in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer
【24h】

Comparison of Patient-reported Outcomes After External Beam Radiation Therapy and Combined External Beam With Low-dose-rate Brachytherapy Boost in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer

机译:外梁放射治疗后患者报告的结果与局部前列腺癌男性低剂量速率近距离放射治疗的外束

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposeTo compare patient-reported disease-specific functional outcomes after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and EBRT combined with low-dose-rate brachytherapy prostate boost (EB-LDR) among men with localized prostate cancer. Methods and MaterialsThe prospective, population-based Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation study enrolled men with localized prostate cancer in 2011 to 2012. The 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite measured patient-reported disease-specific function at baseline and at 6, 12, and 36?months. Higher domain scores indicate better function. Minimal clinically important difference was defined as 6 for urinary incontinence, 5 for urinary irritative function, 4 for bowel function, 12 for sexual function, and 4 for hormonal function. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were fit to estimate the effect of treatment on patient-reported outcomes. ResultsFive-hundred seventy-eight men received EBRT and 109 received EB-LDR. Median patient age was 69?years, and 70% had intermediate- or high-risk disease. Men in the EB-LDR group were younger (P? ?.05). On multivariable analyses, men receiving EB-LDR reported worse urinary irritative function at 6?months (adjusted mean difference [AMD] ?14.4,P?
机译:Purposeto比较外部光束放射治疗(EBRT)和EBRT在具有局部前列腺癌的男性中与低剂量速率的近距离放射治疗前列腺增强(EB-LDR)结合的患者报告的疾病特异性功能结果。方法和物质研究术前期,群体群体对比较效果分析及辐射研究招收局部前列腺癌的男性在2011年至2012年。26项扩展前列腺癌指数复合患者报告的患者报告的疾病特异性功能在基线和6时, 12和36?月。更高的域分数表示更好的功能。最小临床重要的差异定义为6用于尿失禁,5用于尿动刺激功能,4个用于肠功能,12例为性函数,4个用于荷尔蒙功能。多变量的线性和逻辑回归模型适合估算治疗对患者报告的结果的影响。结果 - 百七十八名男子收到EBRT和109收到EB-LDR。中位数患者年龄为69岁?岁月,70%具有中间或高风险疾病。 EB-LDR组中的男性较年轻(P?.05)。在多变量分析中,接受EB-LDR的男性报告6月6日(调整的平均差异[AMD]?14.4,P?<001),12?月(AMD?12.9,P?<001 )和36个月(AMD?4.7,P?=Δ.034)比接受EBRT的人。 12个月,男性接受EB-LDR报道了较差的排便(AMD?5.8,P?= 002),但这些差异在36?几个月中没有看到。治疗组之间的性或激素功能无显着差异。结论使用EB-LDR治疗的结果较差的肠功能在1?年份,尿动刺激函数越来越差,与单独用EBRT治疗的男性相比。考虑EB-LDR与EBRT治疗时,应与患者讨论这些副作用曲线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号