首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Falsification end points for observational studies - Reply
【24h】

Falsification end points for observational studies - Reply

机译:观察研究的伪造终点-答复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In Reply: Falsification hypotheses can help adjudicate whether observational associations are robust or whether they reflect selection bias among patients who receive an intervention. Dr Groenwold thoughtfully expands on a prerequisite to proper falsification analyses: the falsification hypothesis must test a putative mechanism of bias. Consider, for example, the question posed by Groenwold of whether beta-blocker therapy reduces perioperative cardiac risk. Even after adjusting for observed patient demographics and claims-based clinical characteristics, an estimated association between beta-blocker therapy and cardiac risk may still be confounded by unobserved patient and physician characteristics, including unmeasured socioeco-nomic characteristics.
机译:在答复中:证伪假设可以帮助判断观察性关联是否牢固,或者它们是否反映了接受干预的患者之间的选择偏见。 Groenwold博士深思熟虑地提出了进行正确证伪分析的前提条件:证伪假设必须检验一种偏见的推定机制。例如,考虑Groenwold提出的有关β受体阻滞剂治疗是否可以降低围手术期心脏风险的问题。即使在对观察到的患者人口统计学特征和基于索赔的临床特征进行调整之后,β-受体阻滞剂治疗与心脏风险之间的估计关联仍可能会因未观察到的患者和医生特征(包括未测量的社会经济特征)而混淆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号