首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Association between cholecystectomy with vs without intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common duct injury
【24h】

Association between cholecystectomy with vs without intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common duct injury

机译:胆囊切除术伴或不伴术中胆道造影与胆总管损伤风险之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IMPORTANCE: Significant controversy exists regarding routine intraoperative cholangiography in preventing common duct injury during cholecystectomy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between intraoperative cholangiography use during cholecystectomy and common duct injury. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of all Texas Medicare claims data from 2000 through 2009. We identified Medicare beneficiaries 66 years or older who underwent inpatient or outpatient cholecystectomy for biliary colic or biliary dyskinesia, acute cholecystitis, or chronic cholecystitis.We compared results from multilevel logistic regression models to the instrumental variable analyses. INTERVENTIONS: Intraoperative cholangiography use during cholecystectomy was determined at the level of the patients (yeso), hospitals (percentage intraoperative cholangiography use for all cholecystectomies at the hospital), and surgeons (percentage use for all cholecystectomies performed by the surgeon). Percentage of use at the hospital and percentage of use by surgeon were the instrumental variables. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients with claims for common duct repair operations within 1 year of cholecystectomy were considered as having major common duct injury. RESULTS: Of 92 932 patients undergoing cholecystectomy, 37 533 (40.4%) underwent concurrent intraoperative cholangiography and 280 (0.30%) had a common duct injury. The common duct injury rate was 0.21% among patients with intraoperative cholangiography and 0.36%among patients without it. In a logistic regression model controlling for patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics, the odds of common duct injury for cholecystectomies performed without intraoperative cholangiography were increased compared with those performed with it (OR, 1.79 [95%CI, 1.35-2.36]; P < .001). When confounding was controlled with instrumental variable analysis, the association between cholecystectomy performed without intraoperative cholangiography and duct injury was no longer significant (OR, 1.26 [95%CI, 0.81-1.96]; P = .31). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: When confounders were controlled with instrumental variable analysis, there was no statistically significant association between intraoperative cholangiography and common duct injury. Intraoperative cholangiography is not effective as a preventive strategy against common duct injury during cholecystectomy.
机译:重要提示:关于常规术中胆管造影术在预防胆囊切除术中常见导管损伤方面存在重大争议。目的:探讨胆囊切除术中术中胆道造影与胆总管损伤之间的关系。设计,地点和参与者:对从2000年到2009年所有Texas Medicare索赔数据的回顾性队列研究。我们确定了66岁或以上接受住院或门诊胆囊切除术治疗胆绞痛或胆道运动障碍,急性胆囊炎或慢性胆囊炎的Medicare受益人。将多级逻辑回归模型的结果与工具变量分析进行了比较。干预措施:在患者的水平(是/否),医院(医院中所有胆囊切除术的术中胆道造影使用率)和外科医生(由外科医师进行的所有胆囊切除术的使用百分比)确定了胆囊切除术中术中胆道造影的使用率。工具变量是医院使用率和外科医生使用率。主要结果和措施:胆囊切除术后1年内要求进行普通导管修复手术的患者被视为患有严重的普通导管损伤。结果:在92 932例接受胆囊切除术的患者中,37 533(40.4%)人同时接受了术中胆道造影检查,其中280例(0.30%)发生了胆总管损伤。术中胆管造影患者的普通导管损伤率为0.21%,而无胆管造影的患者为0.36%。在控制患者,外科医生和医院特征的逻辑回归模型中,与不进行术中胆道造影术相比,胆囊切除术对胆囊切除术造成的普通导管损伤的几率比采用该方法进行的概率高(OR,1.79 [95%CI,1.35-2.36]; P <.001)。当通过工具变量分析控制混杂时,在不进行术中胆道造影的情况下进行的胆囊切除术与导管损伤之间的关联不再显着(OR,1.26 [95%CI,0.81-1.96]; P = .31)。结论和相关性:当通过工具变量分析控制混杂因素时,术中胆管造影术与普通导管损伤之间没有统计学上的显着关联。术中胆道造影不能有效地预防胆囊切除术中常见的导管损伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号