首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Buprenorphine implants and opioid dependence.
【24h】

Buprenorphine implants and opioid dependence.

机译:丁丙诺啡植入物和阿片类药物依赖性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dr Ling and colleagues1 provided evidence of the effectiveness of buprenorphine implants for the treatment of opioid dependence. However, as Dr O'Connor2 pointed out in his accompanying Editorial, there are barriers to this approach, and it remains to be seen whether this is more effective than the current practice of prescribing sub-lingual buprenorphine in an office-based setting.In their discussion, the study authors made a case for the superiority of implants over the current approach by selectively comparing their 6-month treatment retention of 65.7% with 3 other studies with rates ranging from 33% to 38%. However, none of these studies assessed office-based treatment. One (reference 21 in the article) provided a modest maximum dose of 8 mg per day of buprenorphine; another (reference 22) was a 16-week trial followed by a 10-week taper-off treatment; and the third (reference 20) was a study of a stepped-care approach that reported a 6-month treatment retention of 77%, but approximately half of those assigned to buprenorphine switched to methadone maintenance.
机译:Ling博士及其同事1提供了丁丙诺啡植入物治疗阿片类药物依赖性的有效性的证据。然而,正如O'Connor2博士在其随附的《社论》中指出的那样,这种方法存在障碍,并且是否比目前在办公室环境中处方舌下丁丙诺啡的现行做法更有效尚待观察。在他们的讨论中,研究作者通过有选择地比较其6个月的治疗保留率为65.7%与其他3项研究(其比率从33%到38%)进行比较,证明了植入物优于当前方法的优势。但是,这些研究均未评估基于办公室的治疗。一个人(文章中的参考文献21)提供了每天8 mg丁丙诺啡的适度最大剂量;另一个(参考文献22)是一项为期16周的试验,随后进行了为期10周的渐缩治疗;第三项(参考文献20)是对逐步护理方法的研究,该方法报告了6个月的治疗保留率达77%,但是大约有一半的丁丙诺啡治疗转为美沙酮维持治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号