首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Association of door-in to door-out time with reperfusion delays and outcomes among patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
【24h】

Association of door-in to door-out time with reperfusion delays and outcomes among patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

机译:初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗转入患者的上门入门时间与再灌注延迟和结果之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) requiring interhospital transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) often have prolonged overall door-to-balloon (DTB) times from first hospital presentation to second hospital PCI. Door-in to door-out (DIDO) time, defined as the duration of time from arrival to discharge at the first or STEMI referral hospital, is a new clinical performance measure, and a DIDO time of 30 minutes or less is recommended to expedite reperfusion care. OBJECTIVE: To characterize time to reperfusion and patient outcomes associated with a DIDO time of 30 minutes or less. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort of 14,821 patients with STEMI transferred to 298 STEMI receiving centers for primary PCI in the ACTION Registry-Get With the Guidelines between January 2007 and March 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors associated with a DIDO time greater than 30 minutes, overall DTB times, and risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Median DIDO time was 68 minutes (interquartile range, 43-120 minutes), and only 1627 patients (11%) had DIDO times of 30 minutes or less. Significant factors associated with a DIDO time greater than 30 minutes included older age, female sex, off-hours presentation, and non-emergency medical services transport to the first hospital. Patients with a DIDO time of 30 minutes or less were significantly more likely to have an overall DTB time of 90 minutes or less compared with patients with DIDO times greater than 30 minutes (60% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 57%-62%] vs 13% [95% CI, 12%-13%]; P < .001). Among patients with DIDO times greater than 30 minutes, only 0.6% (95% CI, 0.5%-0.8%) had an absolute contraindication to fibrinolysis. Observed in-hospital mortality was significantly higher among patients with DIDO times greater than 30 minutes vs patients with DIDO times of 30 minutes or less (5.9% [95% CI, 5.5%-6.3%] vs 2.7% [95% CI, 1.9%-3.5%]; P < .001; adjusted odds ratio for in-hospital mortality, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.15-2.12]). CONCLUSION: A DIDO time of 30 minutes or less was observed in only a small proportion of patients transferred for primary PCI but was associated with shorter reperfusion delays and lower in-hospital mortality.
机译:上下文:ST抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者需要医院间转移以进行主要的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),从首次就诊到第二次医院PCI的总体上门到气球(DTB)时间通常会延长。进门到出门(DIDO)时间(定义为从到达第一家或STEMI转诊医院到出院的时间)是一项新的临床表现指标,建议加快DIDO时间30分钟或更短再灌注护理。目的:描述DIDO时间不超过30分钟的再灌注时间和患者预后。设计,地点和患者:2007年1月至2010年3月之间,将148,821例STEMI患者的回顾性队列转移至ACTION注册表中的298个STEMI接受中心接受初级PCI治疗。 30分钟以上,总的DTB时间和风险调整后的住院死亡率。结果:DIDO时间中位数为68分钟(四分位间距为43-120分钟),只有1627名患者(11%)的DIDO时间为30分钟或更短。与DIDO时间超过30分钟相关的重要因素包括年龄,女性,下班时间的陈述以及非紧急医疗服务送往第一医院的情况。与DIDO时间大于30分钟的患者相比,DIDO时间为30分钟或更短的患者具有90分钟或更短的总DTB时间可能性(60%[95%置信区间{CI},57%- 62%]与13%[95%CI,12%-13%]; P <.001)。在DIDO时间大于30分钟的患者中,只有0.6%(95%CI,0.5%-0.8%)具有纤溶绝对禁忌症。 DIDO时间大于30分钟的患者中观察到的院内死亡率显着高于DIDO时间小于或等于30分钟的患者(5.9%[95%CI,5.5%-6.3%] vs 2.7%[95%CI,1.9 %-3.5%]; P <0.001;经调整的院内死亡率比值比为1.56 [95%CI,1.15-2.12]。结论:仅一小部分接受原发性PCI的患者观察到DIDO时间为30分钟或更短,但与再灌注延迟时间较短和院内死亡率较低相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号