...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation Proceedings >The market of human organs: a window into a poorly understood global business.
【24h】

The market of human organs: a window into a poorly understood global business.

机译:人体器官市场:通向了解甚少的全球业务的窗口。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The global demand for human organs has set the stage for an exploding and poorly understood global business in human organs. Whenever there is demand for a product, the opportunity for business arises. The form that a business takes is dependent on a complex network of inputs and outputs, each affecting the others. Historically, the details of any specific market are drastically underestimated. Nowhere is this truer than in the market of human organs. The drivers, which propel the "goods" of human organs, form a flourishing business. Critical analysis is essential to understanding of the supply and demand sides and to determine the role of government in regulating the industry. Governmental groups have dismissed formation of a regulated market for organ sales. The concept is nonetheless a topic of active discussion, motivated by the suffering of patients in need of organs and exploitation of the victims of human trafficking. Ethical principles have been invoked on each side of the ensuing debate. Theory in the absence of sufficient data is shaky ground for enactment of new policy. The Aristotelian concept of "practical wisdom" and the pragmatism of William James illuminate the importance of scientific investigation as guide to policy formation. How will stakeholders benefit or lose? What impact might be anticipated in regard to organized medicine's social contract? What can we learn about cross-cultural differences and their effect on the global landscape?
机译:全球对人体器官的需求为人体器官的爆炸式增长和人们对全球业务了解不足奠定了基础。只要有产品需求,就会有商机。企业采用的形式取决于输入和输出的复杂网络,而每个输入和输出都会相互影响。从历史上看,任何特定市场的细节都被大大低估了。在人体器官市场上,这是最真实的。推动人体器官“商品”发展的司机们生意兴隆。批判分析对于理解供需双方以及确定政府在监管行业中的作用至关重要。政府团体不赞成为器官销售建立规范的市场。尽管如此,这个概念仍然是一个积极讨论的话题,其动机是需要器官的患者的痛苦和对人口贩运受害者的剥削。在随后的辩论中,都引用了道德原则。缺乏足够数据的理论为制定新政策奠定了坚实的基础。亚里士多德的“实践智慧”概念和威廉·詹姆斯的实用主义阐明了科学研究作为制定政策指南的重要性。利益相关者将如何受益?对于有组织医学的社会契约,可能会有什么影响?关于跨文化差异及其对全球格局的影响,我们可以学到什么?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号