...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia: what are the objectives?
【24h】

Intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia: what are the objectives?

机译:高血糖强化治疗:目标是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In his Comment (Aug 7, p 391) on the results of the ACCORD Study, Ronald Klein speculates that the premature termination of the study, consequent on the 22% excess mortality in the intensive glycaemic treatment group, might have resulted in the study being underpowered to show benefit for severe microvascular endpoints. To explore this possibility, we have analysed the effects of intensive glycaemic control on blindness and end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in some 27000 patients with type 2 diabetes in the four major outcome studies. Expressing the estimates as absolute, rather than relative, risk reductions (table), we calculate that intensive glycaemic treatment of 1000 patients for 5 years, resulting in a 0.9% lower glycated haemoglobin level, would prevent 3.7 people (95% Cl -6.1 to 12.3) from developing blindness in one eye and 1.6 people (-1.5 to 4.0) from developing ESRF. During this treatment, seven fewer people would have a myocardial infarction, but 47 more a severe hypoglycaemic event. Cardiovascular and all-cause mortality would be unaffected.
机译:罗纳德·克莱因(Ronald Klein)在他对ACCORD研究结果的评论(8月7日,第391页)中推测,由于强化血糖治疗组死亡率高出22%,该研究过早终止可能导致该研究不足以显示对严重微血管终点的益处。为了探索这种可能性,我们在四项主要结果研究中分析了强化血糖控制对大约27000例2型糖尿病患者的失明和终末期肾衰竭(ESRF)的影响。将估计值表示为绝对(而非相对)降低的风险(表),我们计算出,对1000名患者进行5年的强化降糖治疗,导致糖化血红蛋白水平降低0.9%,将预防3.7人(95%Cl -6.1为12.3)导致一只眼睛失明,有1.6个人(-1.5至4.0)来自ESRF。在此治疗期间,发生心肌梗塞的人数减少了七人,而严重的降血糖事件则增加了47人。心血管和全因死亡率不会受到影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号