...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Chemical Physics >Cutoff radius effect of the isotropic periodic sum and Wolf method in liquid-vapor interfaces of water
【24h】

Cutoff radius effect of the isotropic periodic sum and Wolf method in liquid-vapor interfaces of water

机译:水的水汽界面各向同性周期和沃尔夫法的截止半径效​​应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As a more economical but similarly accurate computation method than the Ewald sum, the isotropic periodic sum (IPS) method for nonpolar molecules (IPSn) and polar molecules (IPSp), along with the Wolf method are of interest, but the cutoff radius dependence is an important issue. To evaluate the cutoff radius effect of the three methods, a water-vapor interfacial system has been studied by molecular dynamics. The Wolf method can produce adequate results for surface tension compared to that of the Ewald sum (within 2.9) at a long enough cutoff radius, r_c. However, the estimation of the electrostatic potential profile and dipole orientational function is poor. The Wolf method cannot estimate electrostatic configuration at r_c L_z2 (L _z is the longest lattice of the system). We have found that the convergence of the surface tension and the electrostatic configuration of the IPSn method is faster than that of the IPSp method. Moreover, the IPSn method is most accurate among the three methods for the same cutoff radius. Furthermore, the behavior of the surface tension against the cutoff radius shows a greater difference for the IPSn and IPSp method. The surface tension of the IPSp method fluctuates and presents a similar result to that of the Ewald sum, but the surface tension for the IPSn method greatly deviates near r_c L _z3. The cause of this deviation is the difference between the interfacial configuration of the water surface and the cutoff treatment of the IPS method. The deviation becomes insignificant far from r_c L _z3. In spite of this shortcoming, the IPSn method gives the most accurate result in estimating the surface tension at r_c L _z2. From all the results in this work, the IPSn and IPSp method have been found to be more accurate than the Wolf method. In conclusion, the surface tension and structure of water-vapor interface can be calculated by the IPSn method when rc is greater than or equal to the longest lattice of the system. The IPSp method and the Wolf method require a longer cutoff radius than the longest lattice of the system to estimate interfacial properties.
机译:作为一种比Ewald总和更经济但更准确的计算方法,非极性分子(IPSn)和极性分子(IPSp)的各向同性周期总和(IPS)方法以及Wolf方法很受关注,但是截止半径的依赖性是一个重要的问题。为了评估这三种方法的截止半径效​​应,通过分子动力学研究了水蒸气界面系统。在足够长的截止半径r_c时,与Ewald之和(在2.9之内)相比,Wolf方法可以产生足够的表面张力结果。但是,静电势分布和偶极子定向函数的估计很差。 Wolf方法无法估计r_c L_z2处的静电构型(L _z是系统的最长晶格)。我们发现,IPSn方法的表面张力和静电构型的收敛速度快于IPSp方法。此外,对于相同的截止半径,IPSn方法在这三种方法中最为准确。此外,对于IPSn和IPSp方法,表面张力相对于截止半径的行为表现出更大的差异。 IPSp方法的表面张力会波动,并且得出与Ewald sum相似的结果,但是IPSn方法的表面张力在r_c L _z3附近大大偏离。该偏差的原因是水表面的界面构造与IPS方法的截止处理之间的差异。偏离r_c L _z3的距离变得微不足道。尽管存在此缺点,但IPSn方法在估算r_c L _z2处的表面张力时仍能提供最准确的结果。从这项工作的所有结果中,发现IPSn和IPSp方法比Wolf方法更准确。总之,当rc大于或等于系统的最长晶格时,可以通过IPSn方法计算水蒸汽界面的表面张力和结构。 IPSp方法和Wolf方法需要比系统最长的晶格更长的截止半径来估计界面性质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号