...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Chemical Physics >Benchmarks for electronically excited states: Time-dependent density functional theory and density functional theory based multireference configuration interaction
【24h】

Benchmarks for electronically excited states: Time-dependent density functional theory and density functional theory based multireference configuration interaction

机译:电子激发态的基准:基于时间的密度泛函理论和基于密度泛函理论的多参考组态相互作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) and DFT-based multireference configuration interaction (DFT/MRCI) calculations are reported for a recently proposed benchmark set of 28 medium-sized organic molecules. Vertical excitation energies, oscillator strengths, and excited-state dipole moments are computed using the same geometries (MP2/6-31G*) and basis set (TZVP) as in our previous ab initio benchmark study on electronically excited states. The results from TD-DFT (with the functionals BP86, B3LYP, and BHLYP) and from DFT/MRCI are compared against the previous high-level ab initio results, and, in particular, against the proposed best estimates for 104 singlet and 63 triplet vertical excitation energies. The statistical evaluation for the latter reference data gives the lowest mean absolute deviations for DFT/MRCI (0.22 eV for singlets and 0.24 eV for triplets) followed by TD-DFT/B3LYP (0.27 and 0.44 eV, respectively), whereas TD-DFT/BP86 and TD-DFT/BHLYP are significantly less accurate. The energies of singlet states with double excitation character are generally overestimated by TD-DFT, whereas triplet state energies are systematically underestimated by the currently investigated DFT-based methods. (c) 2008 American Institute of Physics.
机译:报告了最近提出的包含28种中等尺寸有机分子的基准测试组的时变密度泛函理论(TD-DFT)和基于DFT的多参考配置相互作用(DFT / MRCI)计算。垂直激发能,振荡器强度和激发态偶极矩的计算采用与先前关于电子激发态的从头算基准研究相同的几何形状(MP2 / 6-31G *)和基集(TZVP)。将TD-DFT(具有BP86,B3LYP和BHLYP功能)和DFT / MRCI的结果与以前的高级从头计算结果进行了比较,尤其是与104单重态和63三重态的建议最佳估计值进行了比较。垂直激发能。后一参考数据的统计评估给出了DFT / MRCI的最低平均绝对偏差(单线态为0.22 eV,三重态为0.24 eV),其次是TD-DFT / B3LYP(分别为0.27和0.44 eV),而TD-DFT / BP86和TD-DFT / BHLYP的准确性明显较低。 TD-DFT通常会高估具有双重激发特性的单重态能量,而目前研究的基于DFT的方法会系统地低估三重态能量。 (c)2008年美国物理研究所。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号