...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Effect of a multifaceted performance feedback strategy on length of stay compared with benchmark reports alone: A cluster randomized trial in intensive care
【24h】

Effect of a multifaceted performance feedback strategy on length of stay compared with benchmark reports alone: A cluster randomized trial in intensive care

机译:与单独的基准报告相比,多方面的绩效反馈策略对住院时间的影响:重症监护中的一项集群随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To assess the impact of applying a multifaceted activating performance feedback strategy on intensive care patient outcomes compared with passively receiving benchmark reports. Design: The Information Feedback on Quality Indicators study was a cluster randomized trial, running from February 2009 to May 2011. Setting: Thirty Dutch closed-format ICUs that participated in the national registry. Study duration per ICU was sixteen months. Patients: We analyzed data on 25,552 admissions. Admissions after coronary artery bypass graft surgery were excluded. Intervention: The intervention aimed to activate ICUs to undertake quality improvement initiatives by formalizing local responsibility for acting on performance feedback, and supporting them with increasing the impact of their improvement efforts. Therefore, intervention ICUs established a local, multidisciplinary quality improvement team. During one year, this team received two educational outreach visits, monthly reports to monitor performance over time, and extended, quarterly benchmark reports. Control ICUs only received four standard quarterly benchmark reports. MEASUREMENTS AND Results: The extent to which the intervention was implemented in daily practice varied considerably among intervention ICUs: the average monthly time investment per quality improvement team member was 4.1 hours (SD, 2.3; range, 0.6-8.1); the average number of monthly meetings per quality improvement team was 5.7 (SD, 4.5; range, 0-12). ICU length of stay did not significantly reduce after 1 year in intervention units compared with controls (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.92-1.12]). Furthermore, the strategy had no statistically significant impact on any of the secondary measures (duration of mechanical ventilation, proportion of out-of-range glucose measurements, and all-cause hospital mortality). Conclusions: In the context of ICUs participating in a national registry, applying a multifaceted activating performance feedback strategy did not lead to better patient outcomes than only receiving periodical registry reports.
机译:目的:与被动接收基准报告相比,评估采用多方面的激活绩效反馈策略对重症监护患者结果的影响。设计:《质量指标信息反馈》研究是一项整群随机试验,于2009年2月至2011年5月进行。环境:参与国家注册的30个荷兰封闭格式ICU。每个ICU的研究时间为16个月。患者:我们分析了25552例入院数据。排除冠状动脉搭桥手术后的入院。干预:干预旨在通过正式确定当地对绩效反馈采取行动的责任,并通过增加其改善工作的影响来支持ICU,从而促使ICU采取质量改善措施。因此,干预ICU建立了一个本地的,多学科的质量改进团队。在一年的时间里,该团队接受了两次教育外展访问,每月报告以监控一段时间内的绩效,以及扩展的季度基准报告。控制ICU仅收到四份标准的季度基准报告。测量与结果:在干预ICU中,在日常实践中实施干预的程度差异很大:每个质量改进团队成员的平均每月时间投资为4.1小时(标准差,2.3;范围,0.6-8.1);每个质量改进小组的平均每月会议次数为5.7(标准差,4.5;范围,0-12)。与对照组相比,干预组一年后ICU的住院时间并没有明显减少(危险比,1.02 [95%CI,0.92-1.12])。此外,该策略对任何辅助措施(机械通气的持续时间,血糖测量范围外的比例以及全因医院死亡率)都没有统计学上的显着影响。结论:在ICU参加国家注册系统的情况下,采用多方面的激活性能反馈策略并不能带来比仅接收定期注册系统报告更好的患者预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号