...
首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary clinical trials >Bias analysis of the instrumental variable estimator as an estimator of the average causal effect.
【24h】

Bias analysis of the instrumental variable estimator as an estimator of the average causal effect.

机译:对工具变量估计量的偏差分析作为对平均因果效应的估计量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Noncompliance is a common problem in drawing causal inference in randomized trials. The instrumental variable (IV) method estimates the average causal effect in randomized trials with noncompliance. However, the IV estimator generally yields a biased estimate under a non-null hypothesis, although it can yield an unbiased estimate under a null hypothesis. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the potential bias of the IV estimate quantitatively. This paper provides such a quantitative method, which is an extension of bias analysis for unmeasured confounders using the confounding risk difference in the context of observational studies. The proposed method will help investigators to provide a realistic picture of the potential bias of the IV estimate. It is illustrated using a field trial for coronary heart disease.
机译:在随机试验中,因果推理是得出因果推断的常见问题。工具变量(IV)方法估计不合规随机试验中的平均因果效应。但是,IV估计器在非空假设下通常会产生有偏估计,尽管在零假设下它可能会产生无偏估计。因此,重要的是定量评估IV估计的潜在偏差。本文提供了一种定量方法,它是在观察研究的背景下使用混杂风险差异对未测混杂因素进行偏差分析的扩展。所提出的方法将帮助调查人员提供有关IV估计值潜在偏差的真实图片。使用针对冠心病的现场试验对此进行了说明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号