...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Out with the old or better use of the old? A quest in sedation
【24h】

Out with the old or better use of the old? A quest in sedation

机译:淘汰旧的还是更好地使用旧的?镇静的追求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most mechanically ventilated critically ill patients need to be given sedative drugs to enable effective ventilation, to obtund adverse effects of the sympathetic response, and for the obvious humane reason to avoid distress. Effective analgesia and reassurance are helpful and should be used, but they are generally not sufficient. Sedative drugs do not specifically treat or support a patient during critical illness and indeed have potential to cause harm if used inappropriately (1). A fundamental problem exists that individual patient requirements, which can differ radically, are dependent on a number of factors that cannot be readily predicted or modified. The current evidence base still leaves many unanswered questions or gives conflicting answers regarding the choice of drugs, whether administration should be as an infusion or intermittent bolus (2, 3), how the response should be monitored (4), and the need for routine sedation breaks (5,6).
机译:大多数机械通气的危重病人都需要服用镇静药,以实现有效通气,避免交感神经反应的不良反应,并且出于明显的人道原因避免痛苦。有效的镇痛和放心是有帮助的,应该使用,但通常还不够。镇静药在危重病期间不能专门治疗或支持患者,如果使用不当,确实有可能造成伤害(1)。存在一个基本问题,即各个患者的需求可能会根本不同,取决于无法轻易预测或修改的许多因素。当前的证据基础仍然存在许多悬而未决的问题或关于药物选择,是否应以输注或间歇性推注的方式给予回答(2、3),应如何监测反应(4)以及需要常规治疗镇静休息(5,6)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号