...
首页> 外文期刊>AGROW World Crop Protection News >Court questions US EPA’s analysis of bee risks from sulfoxaflor
【24h】

Court questions US EPA’s analysis of bee risks from sulfoxaflor

机译:法院质疑美国环保署对磺胺嘧啶蜂风险的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A panel of three US federal judges this week appeared sympathetic to beekeepers seeking to block the EPA’s registration of Dow AgroSciences’ insecticide, sulfoxaflor, showing scepticism that the Agency had adequately assessed the potential harm the pesticide may cause bees. The closely watched case could have serious ramifications for the EPA’s effort to ensure bees and other pollinators are protected from legal pesticide uses. It is the first challenge of a pesticide registration that relied upon the Agency’s new framework for assessing risks to pollinators. The dispute centres on the EPA’s decision in May 2013 to grant Dow an unconditional registration for sulfoxaflor, permitting use on a wide array of crops – including canola, soybeans, fruits and leafy vegetables – to control piercing and sucking insects. The EPA said that it had fully evaluated the insecticide’s potential impacts on bees and that the final label included “robust terms” for protecting bees and other pollinators.
机译:由三名美国联邦法官组成的小组本周对养蜂人表示同情,这些养蜂人试图阻止EPA对道琼斯农业科学公司的杀虫剂磺胺草醚的注册,对此表示怀疑,认为该机构已充分评估了该农药可能对蜜蜂造成的潜在危害。受到密切关注的案件可能会对EPA努力确保蜜蜂和其他授粉媒介免受合法农药使用造成严重后果。这是农药注册的第一个挑战,它依赖于原子能机构评估传粉媒介风险的新框架。争议的焦点是美国环保署(EPA)在2013年5月决定向陶氏(Dow)无条件注册磺胺嘧啶的注册,允许其在多种农作物(包括油菜籽,大豆,水果和叶类蔬菜)中使用,以控制刺穿和吸吮昆虫。 EPA说,它已经充分评估了杀虫剂对蜜蜂的潜在影响,最后的标签包括保护蜜蜂和其他授粉媒介的“健壮术语”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号