...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >Automated citrus tree counting from oblique or ortho images and tree height estimation from oblique images.
【24h】

Automated citrus tree counting from oblique or ortho images and tree height estimation from oblique images.

机译:从倾斜或正向图像自动计数柑橘树,从倾斜图像估计树高。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objectives of this research paper were to (1) compare tree counts between oblique and ortho images and (2) determine the accuracy of tree height measurements from oblique images. Accurate determination of tree count and canopy volume can aid growers in planning some orchard operations and estimating yield. The analytical capability of Feature Analyst (FA) to count trees enables the user to quantify the trees in a given area. Eight sample sets of ortho and oblique images were selected from Pictometry aerial imagery software (Pictometry International Corp, 100 Town Center Drive, Suite A, Rochester, NY, 14623) by entering the coordinates of the required area of interest. The images thus obtained were exported to Arc Map in ortho and oblique views. The same training samples randomly selected from the study area in the ortho view were also used for the oblique image in FA to validate/determine the number of trees. The image was represented by a shape file, and an attribute query denoted the quantity of trees. After processing with FA, the majority of the machine counts were below the actual value. Three of the eight ortho images represented over counts, while five represented under count with a total range of -16 to +23%, with a mean error of 8.67%. All the eight oblique images represented under counts with an error range of 0.26 to 27.82% with a mean error of 9.94%. Thus, Oblique images had an error range of 27.56%, while orthogonal images have an error range of 39%, but overall the average error was less for ortho images. An estimate was made of tree height using oblique images in Pictometry. The errors were partially due to the ambiguity in selecting each tree's base and apex. Assuming there may be 0.15 m error due to resolution in ground area covered and tree height centering contributed an 11% error, overall precision in tree canopy volume measurement was still 85%.
机译:该研究论文的目的是(1)比较倾斜图像和正射图像之间的树计数,以及(2)从倾斜图像确定树高测量的准确性。准确确定树木数量和树冠数量可以帮助种植者计划一些果园作业并估算产量。 Feature Analyst(FA)对树木进行计数的分析能力使用户能够量化给定区域中的树木。通过输入所需关注区域的坐标,从Pictometry航空影像软件(Pictometry国际公司,100 Town Center Drive,Suite A,Rochester,NY,14623)中选择了八组正射影像和斜射影像。这样获得的图像以正视图和斜视图导出到Arc Map。在正视图中从研究区域随机选择的相同训练样本也用于FA中的倾斜图像,以验证/确定树木的数量。该图像由形状文件表示,属性查询表示树木的数量。用FA处理后,大多数机器计数都低于实际值。八张正射影像中的三张代表计数过高,而五张代表计数不足,总范围为-16%至+ 23%,平均误差为8.67%。所有八幅倾斜图像均以0.26到27.82%的误差范围计数,平均误差为9.94%。因此,倾斜图像的误差范围为27.56%,而正交图像的误差范围为39%,但总体而言,正交图像的平均误差较小。使用象形法中的倾斜图像对树的高度进行了估计。错误的部分原因是选择每棵树的基部和顶点时的模棱两可。假设由于覆盖的地面区域的分辨率而可能存在0.15 m的误差,并且树木高度居中造成了11%的误差,则树冠体积测量的整体精度仍为85%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号