首页> 外文期刊>Current Science: A Fortnightly Journal of Research >World university rankings and subject ranking in engineering and technology (2015-2016): a case for greater transparency
【24h】

World university rankings and subject ranking in engineering and technology (2015-2016): a case for greater transparency

机译:世界大学工程技术专业排名和学科排名(2015-2016年):更高透明度的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been a great deal of interest in the ranking of academic and research universities across the world, especially in developing economies including India. Ranking lists are periodically released by many for-profit agencies, including Times Higher Education (THE) and Quacquarelli Symonds (QS). All universities vie for a ranking in them, and wish to be listed in the top 100. These ranking exercises are based partly on hard data and partly on the perception of the university. Ranking helps students choose universities and funding agencies supporting research, and add to the overall reputation of universities. Lack of transparency in providing access to the critical data used in the ranking exercise for public scrutiny/verification has drawn intense criticisms on the accuracy and credibility of the process. In this paper, fallacy of recent ranking exercise carried out by THE is illustrated with a study of two institutions in Asia.
机译:全球学术和研究型大学的排名引起了人们极大的兴趣,特别是在包括印度在内的发展中经济体中。排名列表由许多以营利为目的的机构定期发布,其中包括Times Times Education(THE)和Quacquarelli Symonds(QS)。所有大学都在争夺排名,并希望进入前100名。这些排名练习部分基于硬数据,部分基于对大学的看法。排名可以帮助学生选择支持研究的大学和资助机构,并增加大学的整体声誉。由于缺乏透明性,无法公开访问等级排名过程中使用的关键数据以进行公众审查/验证,因此对该过程的准确性和可信性提出了强烈的批评。本文通过对亚洲两个机构的研究说明了THE进行的近期排名活动的谬误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号