首页> 外文期刊>Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Psychology >Too much of a good thing: Stronger bilingual inhibition leads to larger lag-2 task repetition costs
【24h】

Too much of a good thing: Stronger bilingual inhibition leads to larger lag-2 task repetition costs

机译:太好了:加强双语抑制会导致更大的lag-2任务重复成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Inhibitory control and monitoring abilities of Hebrew-English bilingual and English monolingual university students were compared, in a paradigm requiring participants to switch between performing three distinct tasks. Inhibitory control was gauged by lag-2 task repetition costs, namely decreased performance on the final trial of sequences of type ABA relative to CBA, due to persisting inhibition of the recently abandoned task. Bilinguals had larger lag-2 repetition costs, which reflect stronger inhibition of a no-longer relevant task to facilitate a switch into a new task. Monitoring ability was measured by the fadeout effect, which reflects adaptation to simpler task demands when a single task block immediately and unexpectedly follows mixed task blocks. Bilinguals did not differ from monolinguals in the magnitude or trajectory of the fade-out effect. Thus, results support the notion of increased bilingual inhibitory control, even when it is detrimental to performance, and do not demonstrate a specific bilingual advantage in monitoring. These findings are discussed in the context of the recent debate concerning the locus of bilingual advantages.
机译:比较了希伯来语英语和英语双语学生的抑制控制和监控能力,该范式要求参与者在执行三个不同的任务之间切换。抑制性控制是通过滞后2任务重复成本来衡量的,即由于持续抑制最近放弃的任务,ABA型序列相对于CBA的最终试验性能下降。双语人员的lag-2重复成本较高,这反映出对不再需要执行的相关任务的抑制作用更大,以便于转换为新任务。监视能力是通过淡入淡出效果来衡量的,淡出效果反映了当单个任务块立即且意外地跟随混合任务块时,对更简单任务需求的适应性。双语者在淡出效果的大小或轨迹方面与单语者没有区别。因此,结果支持增加双语抑制控制的概念,即使它对性能有害,并且在监测中也没有表现出特定的双语优势。这些发现是在有关双语优势所在的最近辩论的背景下讨论的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号