...
首页> 外文期刊>日本畜産学会報 >Analysis of Increase on U.S. hog marketing under prearranged producer-packer marketing agreement and influence on U.S. pork futures trading at Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME)
【24h】

Analysis of Increase on U.S. hog marketing under prearranged producer-packer marketing agreement and influence on U.S. pork futures trading at Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME)

机译:预先制定的生产者-包装者营销协议下美国生猪市场增长的分析以及对芝加哥商品交易所(CME)美国猪肉期货交易的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

U.S. pork production sector is undergoing a significant change in its size and ownership structure. Further, the marketing linkages of pork producers with meat packers are changing dramatically. In the 1980 s. there were very limited arrangements for contract production and long-term marketing in the pork sector, but in 2000, long-term marketing contracts have rapidly expanded. The objective of this survey is to analyze these changes of marketing and influence to CME pork futures market. The main findings of this study were as follows: (1) Pork is still popular meat to U.S. consumers and per capita consumption of pork in U.S. has been stable since 1970. (2) U.S. pork supply from North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) area especially U.S. & Canada has been between 97.2 percent and 99.0 percent of total supply and U.S. pork export has been only between 1.5 percent and 6.6 percent of total supply since 1990. U.S. hog production have been mainly targeted to U.S. domestic consumers, not to export.Therefore, U.S. hog production and distribution system has worked mainly for U.S. domestic market. (3) Average coefficients of variation per year on U.S. domestic pork prices during the period of 1995-2000 were 12.34 percent/year on producer prices, 8.99 percent/year on wholesale prices. 2.44 percent/year on retail prices. U.S. pork producers have taken the largest risk on price volatilities within U.S. domestic distribution. (4) The use of marketing contracts between U.S. hog producers and meat packers has increased sharply in recent years. Nearly only 5 percent of the U.S. domestic hog mareketing in 1980 were under some type of prearranged arrangement with the packer but this number was up to nearly 14 percent in 2000. The dominant type of agreementis a formula price contract, especially for the largest producers. This contract is ongoing agreements between the packer and producer in which the selling price is linked with the movement of cash price. (5) The more long-term contracts between producers and packers will increase, the less price risks the producers will take. In 1997, Lean Hog futures trading started on Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) instead of Live Hog, which is the CME Lean Hog Index, a two-day weighted average of USDA Lean Hog carcass slaughter cost prices. Lean Hog futures trading have cash-settlement system. The marketing volume on hog cash market has so much decreased that we guess the estimated volume of Lean Hog would be less than volume of Live hog.
机译:美国猪肉生产部门的规模和所有权结构正在发生重大变化。此外,猪肉生产商与肉类包装商之间的营销联系正在发生巨大变化。在1980年代。猪肉部门的合同生产和长期销售的安排非常有限,但是在2000年,长期销售合同迅速扩大。这项调查的目的是分析行销的这些变化以及对芝商所猪肉期货市场的影响。这项研究的主要发现如下:(1)猪肉仍然是美国消费者的热门肉类,并且美国的人均猪肉消费量自1970年以来一直稳定。(2)来自北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)的美国猪肉供应自1990年以来,特别是美国和加拿大,该地区占总供应量的97.2%至99.0%,美国猪肉出口仅占总供应量的1.5%至6.6%。美国生猪生产主要针对美国国内消费者,而不是出口因此,美国生猪生产和分销系统主要针对美国国内市场。 (3)1995-2000年期间,美国国内猪肉价格的年平均变动系数按生产者价格计算为12.34%/年,按批发价格计算为8.99%/年。零售价的2.44%/年。在美国国内分销中,美国猪肉生产商承受的价格波动风险最大。 (4)近年来,美国生猪生产商和肉类包装商之间使用营销合同的数量急剧增加。 1980年,在美国国内养猪市场中,只有约5%与包装商进行了某种形式的预先安排,但到2000年,这一数字已高达近14%。主要的协议类型是配方奶价格合同,特别是对于最大的生产商。该合同是包装商和生产商之间正在进行的协议,其中销售价格与现金价格的变动相关。 (5)生产者与包装者之间的长期合同越多,生产者所承担的价格风险就越小。 1997年,瘦肉猪期货交易从芝加哥商品交易所(CME)开始,而不是生猪,即CME瘦肉猪指数,这是USDA瘦肉猪Ho体屠宰成本价格的两天加权平均值。瘦肉猪期货交易具有现金结算系统。生猪现金市场的营销量已大大减少,以至我们估计瘦肉猪的估计数量将少于生猪的数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号