首页> 外文期刊>College & Research Libraries >Faculty and student attitudes toward credit courses for library skills
【24h】

Faculty and student attitudes toward credit courses for library skills

机译:师生对图书馆技能学分课程的态度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Libraries have used credit classes as one method of teaching library and research skills to students for many years. A 1995 survey conducted by the LOEX Clearinghouse for Library Instruction reported that 30 percent of libraries offer basic library skills courses or academic subject area library research classes for credit.(FN1) Credit courses have been used consistently since 1987 at the institutions surveyed. Other methods such as lectures, computer-assisted instruction, videotapes, and pathfinders or guides also have been used consistently since 1987.(FN2) The relative merits of these various methods also have been debated for many years. Several studies have documented the effectiveness of credit courses for improving students' knowledge of library and research skills using pretests and posttests of student learning.(FN3) Credit courses continue to be developed and added into some college and university curricula, whereas other universities have discontinued for-credit library courses.(FN4,5) RESEARCH QUESTIONS Despite these evaluations and long-standing debates, little research is reported on what value faculty and students place on credit courses. Do the faculty and students consider instruction in library and research skills important? What methods of instruction do they prefer? What are they willing to use? How much administrative support is necessary for credit classes? This paper reports on a study addressing these questions. BACKGROUND Librarians at Oregon State University (OSU) teach several one-credit, discipline-specific library research courses for academic departments. In 1998, the library assessed the importance of these classes to the faculty and students as part of an overall review of the services provided to the campus by Information Services (IS).
机译:多年来,图书馆一直将学分制作为向学生教授图书馆和研究技能的一种方法。 LOEX图书馆教学资料交换所在1995年进行的一项调查显示,有30%的图书馆提供基本的图书馆技能课程或学术领域的图书馆研究课程来获得信贷。(FN1)自1987年以来,所调查的机构一直在使用信贷课程。自1987年以来,诸如演讲,计算机辅助教学,录像带,探路者或指南之类的其他方法也一直被使用。(FN2)这些方法的相对优点也已被争论了很多年。多项研究已证明学分课程可通过学生学习的前测和后测来提高学生对图书馆和研究技能的了解的有效性。(FN3)学分课程仍在继续开发中,并已添加到某些大学课程中,而其他大学则已停学(FN4,5)研究问题尽管进行了这些评估和长期的辩论,但关于教职员工和学生对学分课程的重视程度的研究很少。教师和学生是否认为图书馆教学和研究技能重要?他们更喜欢哪种教学方法?他们愿意使用什么?学分班需要多少行政支持?本文报告了针对这些问题的研究。背景技术俄勒冈州立大学(OSU)的图书馆员为学术部门教授几种单学分,特定学科的图书馆研究课程。 1998年,图书馆评估了这些课程对教师和学生的重要性,这是对信息服务(IS)向校园提供的服务进行总体评估的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号