...
首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive therapy and research >A 'Triple W'-model of rumination on sadness: Why am I feeling sad, what's the meaning of my sadness, and wish I could stop thinking about my sadness (but I can't!)
【24h】

A 'Triple W'-model of rumination on sadness: Why am I feeling sad, what's the meaning of my sadness, and wish I could stop thinking about my sadness (but I can't!)

机译:悲伤的一种“三重W”模型:为什么我感到悲伤,悲伤的含义是什么,希望我能不再考虑悲伤(但我不能!)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Depressive rumination has been found to be a critical factor in the onset and maintenance of depression [for a recent review, see Nolen-Hoeksema, In C. Papageorgiou, & A. Wells (Eds.), Depressive rumination: Nature, theory, and treatment (pp. 107-124). Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2004], but an issue still to be resolved is whether some aspects of depressive rumination are more damaging than others. Some studies have found depressive rumination to have a single factor, others describe several dimensions. This study addresses (a) whether a single or multi-factorial model is most appropriate, and if so, (b) which aspect of depressive rumination is the most pathological. In Study One, a measure of depressive rumination, the Rumination on Sadness Scale (RSS; Conway, Csank, Holm, & Blake, Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 404-425, 2000), was given to 152 students (128 women). Reliability and validity for the RSS was corroborated. The RSS was then used to further investigate the multi-component nature of depressive rumination. Confirmatory Factor Analyses on the RSS revealed a three-factor solution; "ruminating about the reasons for my sadness" (Causal Analysis), "ruminating about the meaning of my sadness" (Understanding), and "uncontrollability of this ruminative thinking on my sadness" (Uncontrollability). In order to strengthen the three subscales, eight new items were added. Four items of the original RSS were deleted. In Study 2, using this extended scale (Leuven Adaptation of the Rumination on Sadness Scale; LARSS), the three-factor model was replicated in a second sample (N = 219). Depressive symptoms and the tendency to suppress negative thinking (Wenzlaff & Luxton, Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 293-308, 2003) were associated with Uncontrollability of ruminative thinking. Results confirm the importance of distinguishing different components in depressive rumination and tentatively suggest that the meta-ruminative factor, uncontrollability of rumination, is particularly problematic.
机译:已发现抑郁性反刍是抑郁症发作和维持的关键因素[最近的综述,请参见Nolen-Hoeksema,C。Papageorgiou和A.Wells(编),抑郁性反刍:自然,理论和处理(第107-124页)。英国奇切斯特:威利(Wiley),2004年],但还有一个尚待解决的问题是抑郁沉思的某些方面是否比其他方面更具破坏性。一些研究发现抑郁症的反省有一个单一的因素,另一些则描述了多个方面。这项研究探讨了(a)单因素模型或多因素模型是否最合适,如果这样,(b)抑郁反省的哪个方面最病理。在研究一中,对抑郁性反省的一种测量方法,是对152名学生(128名女性)进行了“悲伤反省量表”(RSS; Conway,Csank,Holm和Blake,《人格评估》,75,404-425,2000)。 。 RSS的可靠性和有效性得到了证实。然后,将RSS用于进一步研究抑郁性反刍的多组分性质。 RSS的验证性因素分析揭示了一种三因素解决方案。 “思考我的悲伤的原因”(因果分析),“思考我的悲伤的含义”(理解)和“这种关于我的悲伤的反省思想的不可控制性”(不可控制性)。为了加强三个分量表,增加了八个新项目。原始RSS的四项已删除。在研究2中,使用这种扩展的量表(沉思的鲁汶适应量表; LARSS),将三因素模型复制到第二个样本中(N = 219)。抑郁症状和抑制消极思维的倾向(Wenzlaff&Luxton,《认知疗法与研究》,27,293-308,2003)与反刍思维的不可控制性有关。结果证实了在抑郁性反刍中区分不同成分的重要性,并初步表明,反刍的元反刍因子尤其成问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号