...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical primatology >Evaluation of four hematology and a chemistry portable benchtop analyzers using non-human primate blood
【24h】

Evaluation of four hematology and a chemistry portable benchtop analyzers using non-human primate blood

机译:使用非人类灵长类动物血液评估四种血液学和化学便携式台式分析仪

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Near patient testing (NPT) and point-of-care testing (POCT) using portable benchtop analyzers has become necessary in many areas of the medical community, including biocontainment. Methods We evaluated the Beckman AcT diff, Abaxis Vetscan HMII (two instruments), Abbott Cell-Dyn 1800, and Abaxis Vetscan VS2 for within-run precision and correlation to central laboratory instruments using non-human primates blood. Results Compared with the central laboratory instruments, the Beckman AcT diff correlated on 80%; the HMII instruments on 31% and 44%, the CD1800 on 31%, and the VS2 on 71% of assays. For assays with published manufacturers precision guidelines, the AcT diff met all nine, the HMII instruments met one and six of six, and the CD 1800 met one of six. Conclusions Laboratories using NPT/POCT must test their individual instruments for precision and correlation, identify assays that are reliable, and exclude or develop supplemental procedures for assays that are not.
机译:背景技术在医疗界的许多领域,包括生物围护,使用便携式台式分析仪进行近距离患者测试(NPT)和即时护理测试(POCT)变得十分必要。方法我们评估了Beckman AcT差异,Abaxis Vetscan HMII(两种仪器​​),Abbott Cell-Dyn 1800和Abaxis Vetscan VS2的运行内精度以及与使用非人类灵长类动物血液的中央实验室仪器的相关性。结果与中心实验室仪器相比,贝克曼AcT差异为80%。 HMII仪器占31%和44%,CD1800占31%,VS2占71%。对于采用已发布的制造商精度指南的测定,AcT差异满足所有九种要求,HMII仪器满足六种要求之一和六种,而CD 1800满足六种要求之一。结论使用NPT / POCT的实验室必须测试其各自的仪器的精密度和相关性,鉴定可靠的测定,并排除或制定不适用的补充程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号