...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes, obesity & metabolism >Improvement of glycaemia control in subjects with type 2 diabetes by self-monitoring of blood glucose: comparison of two management programs adjusting bedtime insulin dosage.
【24h】

Improvement of glycaemia control in subjects with type 2 diabetes by self-monitoring of blood glucose: comparison of two management programs adjusting bedtime insulin dosage.

机译:通过自我监测血糖改善2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:两种调整就寝时间胰岛素剂量的管理方案的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is important for patients treated with insulin to detect asymptomatic hypoglycaemia and to guide patients towards reaching blood glucose goal. This study compared two management programs for adjusting bedtime insulin dose: program 1 (performed by study subjects) vs. program 2 (performed by study subjects and reminded by investigators). METHODS: This is a prospective, open-level, 28-week randomized trial in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic subjects. One hundred subjects treated with oral antidiabetic drugs plus bedtime insulin with glycated haemoglobin A(1C) (A1C) >8.0% were screened and received a structure education package in a 4-week run-in period. Seventy-eight subjects were randomized to two treatment programs (adjust insulin dose by themselves with or without investigators' reminder) and reviewed by the investigators at a 4-week interval clinical visit. RESULTS: The mean SMBG decreased significantly in both groups, with a greater decrease observed in program 2 vs. program 1 (from 198.7 +/- 43.1 to 122.6 +/- 21.9 mg/dl vs. from 194.0 +/- 42.7 to 151.6 +/- 37.7 mg/dl, p < 0.001). Bedtime insulin dose increased in both groups with a greater increase in program 2 (from 14.4 +/- 8.7 to 27.4 +/- 12.8 IU vs. from 14.3 +/- 8.3 to 18.4 +/- 6.2 IU, p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in A1C from 9.54 +/- 1.67% to 7.76 +/- 1.27%, with a greater decrease (p < 0.001) in program 2 (2.17%) than in program 1 (1.40%). There were more subjects in the program 2 group achieving the treating targets: mean SMBG < or =120 mg/dl (46.9 vs. 17.9%) and A1C < or =7.0% (54.5 vs. 32.2%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypoglycaemia and body weight changes. CONCLUSIONS: Systematically titrating bedtime insulin dose added to oral therapy, especially combined with health care reminders, can safely improve glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes with poor glycaemic control. This regimen may facilitate safe and effective insulin therapy in routine medical practice and improve achievement of recommended standards of diabetes care.
机译:目的:血糖自我监测(SMBG)对于接受胰岛素治疗的患者检测无症状性低血糖并指导患者达到血糖目标很重要。这项研究比较了两种调整就寝时间胰岛素剂量的管理程序:程序1(由研究对象执行)与程序2(由研究对象执行并由研究者提醒)。方法:这是一项前瞻性,开放水平,为期28周的随机对照试验,用于控制不良的2型糖尿病患者。筛选了一百名接受口服抗糖尿病药物加含糖化血红蛋白A(1C)(A1C)> 8.0%的就寝时间胰岛素的受试者,并在4周的试用期内接受了结构培训。将78名受试者随机分为两个治疗方案(在有或没有研究者提醒的情况下自行调整胰岛素剂量),并由研究者每隔4周进行一次临床随访。结果:两组的平均SMBG均显着下降,与计划1相比,计划2的下降幅度更大(从198.7 +/- 43.1到122.6 +/- 21.9 mg / dl,而从194.0 +/- 42.7到151.6 + +/- 37.7 mg / dl,p <0.001)。两组的就寝时间胰岛素剂量均随着程序2的增加而增加(从14.4 +/- 8.7增至27.4 +/- 12.8 IU,而从14.3 +/- 8.3增至18.4 +/- 6.2 IU,p <0.001)。 A1C从9.54 +/- 1.67%显着降低到7.76 +/- 1.27%,与计划1(1.40%)相比,计划2(2.17%)的下降幅度更大(p <0.001)。程序2组中有更多的受试者达到治疗目标:平均SMBG <或= 120 mg / dl(46.9比17.9%)和A1C <或= 7.0%(54.5比32.2%)。低血糖发生率和体重变化没有显着差异。结论:全身性滴定就寝时间的胰岛素剂量,尤其是与健康护理提示相结合,可以安全地改善血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制。该方案可以促进常规医疗实践中安全有效的胰岛素治疗,并改善推荐的糖尿病护理标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号