...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Virological Methods >Comparison of fast-track diagnostics respiratory pathogens multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay with in-house singleplex assays for comprehensive detection of human respiratory viruses
【24h】

Comparison of fast-track diagnostics respiratory pathogens multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay with in-house singleplex assays for comprehensive detection of human respiratory viruses

机译:快速跟踪诊断呼吸道病原体的多重实时RT-PCR检测与内部单重检测可全面检测人类呼吸道病毒的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Fast-track Diagnostics respiratory pathogens (FTDRP) multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay was compared with in-house singleplex real-time RT-PCR assays for detection of 16 common respiratory viruses. The FTDRP assay correctly identified 26 diverse respiratory virus strains, 35 of 41 (85%) external quality assessment samples spiked with cultured virus and 232 of 263 (88%) archived respiratory specimens that tested positive for respiratory viruses by in-house assays. Of 308 prospectively tested respiratory specimens selected from children hospitalized with acute respiratory illness, 270 (87.7%) and 265 (86%) were positive by FTDRP and in-house assays for one or more viruses, respectively, with combined test results showing good concordance (K = 0.812, 95% CI = 0.786–0.838). Individual FTDRP assays for adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus and rhinovirus showed the lowest comparative sensitivities with in-house assays, with most discrepancies occurring with specimens containing low virus loads and failed to detect some rhinovirus strains, even when abundant. The FTDRP enterovirus and human bocavirus assays appeared to be more sensitive than the in-house assays with some specimens. With the exceptions noted above, most FTDRP assays performed comparably with in-house assays for most viruses while offering enhanced throughput and easy integration by laboratories using conventional real-time PCR instrumentation.
机译:将快速诊断呼吸道病原体(FTDRP)多重实时RT-PCR分析与内部单重实时RT-PCR分析进行比较,以检测16种常见呼吸道病毒。 FTDRP测定法正确鉴定了26种不同的呼吸道病毒株,41种(85%)外部质量评估样品中的35种掺入了培养的病毒,以及263种(263%(88%))存档的呼吸道标本中的232种,这些标本通过内部检测呈阳性。在308例接受急性呼吸道疾病住院的儿童中进行的前瞻性测试呼吸道标本中,FTDRP和内部检测对一种或多种病毒分别为270(87.7%)和265(86%)呈阳性,综合测试结果显示出良好的一致性(K = 0.812,95%CI = 0.786–0.838)。单独进行的腺病毒,呼吸道合胞病毒和鼻病毒的FTDRP检测与内部检测相比显示出最低的敏感性,其中大多数差异发生在病毒载量低的样本中,即使丰盛,也未能检测到某些鼻病毒株。 FTDRP肠病毒和人博卡病毒测定似乎比一些标本的内部测定更敏感。除了上面提到的例外,大多数FTDRP分析与大多数病毒的内部分析相比都具有可比性,同时提供了更高的通量,并且实验室可以使用常规实时PCR仪器轻松整合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号