首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Interventional Radiology Deserves Formal Recognition as a Distinct Medical Subspecialty: A Statement from the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association
【24h】

Interventional Radiology Deserves Formal Recognition as a Distinct Medical Subspecialty: A Statement from the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association

机译:介入放射学值得正式承认为不同的医学专业:加拿大介入放射学协会的一份声明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2003, the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA), the national body that represents interventional radiology (IR) in Canada, applied to the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) for subspecialty recognition under the broader specialty of diagnostic radiology. The application was widely supported by stakeholder specialty societies and involved a two-step process. Step 1 was approved on March 22, 2004. Step 2 was rejected by the Committee of Specialties on May 4, 2006, on the grounds that IR did not meet the criteria of a subspecialty. The RCPSC also stated that the entry routes into IR were too restrictive, the extra training beyond that of diagnostic radiology did not meet the expectations for a subspecialty, and the advancement of an area focused on 'additional technical competence' didnot justify the formal designation of a subspecialty. This decision was appealed by the CIRA, and the case was reheard by the same Committee of Specialties that had initially refused the application. Ultimately, the final decision was announced by letter on May 23, 2007-rejection again on the basis of their conclusion that IR did not fulfill the criteria of a subspecialty. According to the RCPSC, the CIRA may not re-apply for subspecialty recognition for another 3 years from the date of the May 23 letter. More in-depth details of the process and events that occurred may be found in the article by Woolfson et al (1).
机译:2003年,代表加拿大介入放射学(IR)的国家机构加拿大介入放射学协会(CIRA)向加拿大皇家内科医生与外科医生学院(RCPSC)申请了诊断放射学更广泛专业下的亚专业认可。该申请得到了利益相关者专业协会的广泛支持,涉及两个步骤。步骤1于2004年3月22日获得批准。步骤2被专业委员会于2006年5月4日拒绝,理由是IR不符合专科标准。 RCPSC还指出,进入IR的途径过于严格,超出诊断放射学范围的额外培训未达到对亚专业的期望,而专注于“附加技术能力”的领域的发展也没有理由正式指定子专业。 CIRA对此决定提出上诉,最初​​拒绝该申请的同一专业委员会再次审理此案。最终,最终决定于2007年5月23日以信函形式宣布-再次基于其IR不符合专科标准的结论而被拒绝。根据RCPSC的规定,自5月23日发出信函之日起,再过三年,CIRA可能不会再次申请亚专业认证。 Woolfson等人(1)的文章中可以找到有关过程和事件的更深入的详细信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号