...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >In vivo efficiency of multipolar radiofrequency ablation with two bipolar electrodes: a comparative experimental study in pig kidney.
【24h】

In vivo efficiency of multipolar radiofrequency ablation with two bipolar electrodes: a comparative experimental study in pig kidney.

机译:具有两个双极电极的多极射频消融的体内效率:猪肾脏中的对比实验研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare in vivo efficacy of multipolar radiofrequency (RF) ablation with two internally cooled electrodes to that of monopolar RF ablation with internally cooled single and cluster needles to induce coagulation in in vivo porcine kidneys. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four coagulations were created in the kidneys of 12 pigs by means of laparotomy by using a monopolar or multipolar RF system. In the monopolar mode, RF was applied to a single internally cooled probe (group A) or to a cluster probe (group B) for 12 minutes. In the multipolar mode, RF was applied to two bipolar probes with 2-cm interprobe spacing up to 50 kJ (group C). Technical parameters and the dimensions, shapes, and coefficients of variation of the coagulations were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The minimum transverse diameters of the RF-induced coagulations in groups B (3.5 cm+/-0.5) and C (3.8 cm+/-0.6) were significantly larger than that in group A (2.6 cm+/-0.3). The mean coagulation volumes produced in themultipolar group (25.1 cm3+/-5.2) were greater than those produced in the monopolar groups (11.6 cm3+/-3.7 and 18.1 cm3+/-5.8) (P<.05). The mean ratio of transverse diameter to vertical diameter of the coagulations was larger in groups B and C (1.2+/-0.2 and 1.0+/-0.1, respectively) than in group A (0.8+/-0.2) (P<.05). In addition, the coefficients of variation for groups A, B, and C were 0.33, 0.30, and 0.21, respectively. The procedure time was longer with the multipolar technique (27.2 minutes+/-4.9) than with the monopolar technique with a single or cluster probe (12 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: Multipolar RF ablation showed at least equivalent or better in vivo efficiency for creating a larger coagulation than monopolar RF ablation with single or cluster electrodes, but with a longer procedure time and at slightly greater complexity.
机译:目的:比较使用两个内部冷却电极的多极射频(RF)消融术与使用内部冷却的单针和簇状针头诱导体内猪肾脏凝结的单极RF消融术的体内疗效。材料与方法:采用单极或多极射频系统,通过剖腹术在12头猪的肾脏中产生了24个凝结物。在单极模式下,将RF施加到单个内部冷却的探针(A组)或群集探针(B组)12分钟。在多极模式下,RF被应用到两个双极探针,探针间距2 cm,最大间隔为50 kJ(C组)。比较了三组之间的技术参数以及凝血的尺寸,形状和变异系数。结果:RF诱导凝血的最小横径在B组(3.5 cm +/- 0.5)和C组(3.8 cm +/- 0.6)显着大于A组(2.6 cm +/- 0.3)。多极组产生的平均凝结体积(25.1 cm3 +/- 5.2)大于单极组产生的平均凝结体积(11.6 cm3 +/- 3.7和18.1 cm3 +/- 5.8)(P <.05)。 B组和C组的凝结物横向直径与垂直直径的平均比(分别为1.2 +/- 0.2和1.0 +/- 0.1)大于A组(0.8 +/- 0.2)(P <.05 )。此外,A,B和C组的变异系数分别为0.33、0.30和0.21。与使用单探针或簇探针的单极技术(12分钟)相比,多极技术的操作时间更长(27.2分钟+/- 4.9)。结论:与使用单电极或簇电极的单极射频消融相比,多极射频消融在产生更大的凝结方面显示出至少等效或更好的体内效率,但过程时间更长且复杂性稍高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号