首页> 外文期刊>Journal of travel medicine. >A comparison of pharmacist travel-health specialists' versus primary care providers' recommendations for travel-related medications, vaccinations, and patient compliance in a college health setting.
【24h】

A comparison of pharmacist travel-health specialists' versus primary care providers' recommendations for travel-related medications, vaccinations, and patient compliance in a college health setting.

机译:在大学健康环境中,针对与旅行相关的药物,疫苗接种和患者依从性的药剂师旅行保健专家与初级保健提供者的建议进行了比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Pretravel medication and vaccination recommendations and receipt were compared between primary care providers (PCPs) without special training and clinical pharmacists specializing in pretravel health. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients seen for pretravel health services in a pharmacist-run travel clinic (PTC) compared to PCPs at a University Student Health Center. Vaccine/medication recommendations were assessed for consistency with national/international guidelines. Medical/pharmacy records were queried to determine the receipt of medications/vaccinations. RESULTS: The PTC recommended antibiotics for travelers' diarrhea were given more often when indicated (96% vs 50%, p < 0.0001), and patients seen in the PTC received their medications more often (75% vs 63%, p = 0.04). PCPs prescribed more antibiotics for travelers' diarrhea that were inconsistent with guidelines (not ordered when indicated 49% vs 6%, p < 0.0001 and ordered when not indicated 21% vs 3%, p < 0.0001). The PTC prescribed antimalarials more often when indicated (98% vs 81%, p < 0.0001), while PCPs prescribed more antimalarials that were inconsistent with guidelines (not ordered when indicated 15% vs 1%, p < 0.0001 and ordered when not indicated 19% vs 2%, p < 0.0001). The PTC ordered more vaccines per patient when indicated (mean = 2.77 vs 2.31, p = 0.0012). PTC patients were more likely to receive vaccines when ordered (mean = 2.38 vs 1.95, p = 0.0039). PCPs recommended more vaccines per patient that were inconsistent with guidelines (not ordered when indicated: mean = 0.78 vs 0.12, p < 0.0001, ordered when not indicated: mean 0.18 vs 0.025, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacist-run pretravel health clinic can provide consistent evidence-based care and improve patient compliance compared to PCPs without special training. Pretravel health is a dynamic and specialized field that requires adequate time, resources, and expertise to deliver the best possible care.
机译:背景:在没有经过专门培训的初级保健提供者(PCP)和专门从事旅行前健康的临床药剂师之间,比较了旅行前的药物和疫苗接种的建议和接受程度。方法:回顾性图表审查了在药房经营的旅行诊所(PTC)中旅行前的健康服务与大学学生健康中心中的PCP进行比较的患者。评估疫苗/药物建议与国家/国际准则的一致性。查询医疗/药房记录以确定药物/疫苗的接收情况。结果:PTC在建议的情况下更经常给予旅行者腹泻推荐的抗生素(96%vs 50%,p <0.0001),在PTC中看过的患者更经常使用药物(75%vs 63%,p = 0.04) 。 PCP为旅行者的腹泻开出了更多与指南不一致的抗生素(指示为49%vs. 6%时未订购,p <0.0001;未指示为21%vs 3%,p <0.0001时订购)。 PTC在指示时更频繁地开出抗疟药(98%vs 81%,p <0.0001),而PCP在处方中开出更多与指导方针不一致的抗疟药(在指示时为15%对1%,无顺序,p <0.0001,在未指示时为有序19 %vs 2%,p <0.0001)。指示时,PTC为每位患者订购了更多疫苗(平均= 2.77 vs 2.31,p = 0.0012)。 PTC患者在订购时更有可能接种疫苗(平均值= 2.38 vs 1.95,p = 0.0039)。 PCP建议为每位患者提供更多与指导方针不一致的疫苗(指示时未排序:均值= 0.78 vs 0.12,p <0.0001,未指示时已排序:均值0.18 vs 0.025,p <0.0001)。结论:与未经特殊培训的PCP相比,由药剂师经营的旅行前健康诊所可提供一致的循证护理,并改善患者的依从性。旅行前健康是一个充满活力的专业领域,需要足够的时间,资源和专业知识来提供最佳的护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号