...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Vegetation Science >Tree spacing and area of competitive influence do not scale with tree size in an African rain forest
【24h】

Tree spacing and area of competitive influence do not scale with tree size in an African rain forest

机译:在非洲雨林中,树木的间隔和竞争影响的面积不会随树木的大小而变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Questions: Is the area of influence of individual trees determined by tree size? Does competition, inferred from spatial pattern between neighbouring trees, affect adult tree spacing patterns in an tropical forest? At what size-class or stage is competition between neighbours most likely to affect adult tree spacing patterns? Location: Kibale National Park, western Uganda. Methods: Relationships between focal tree size and nearest neighbour distance, size, density, and species in a 4-ha permanent plot, using point pattern analyses. Results: We found non-random patterns of distribution of nearest tree neighbours (stems > 10 cm DBH). Independent of identity, tree density was highest and neighbours were regularly spaced within 3-5m of an individual. Tree densities were lower and relatively constant at distances >5m and neighbours were typically randomly spaced. In general, conspecific patterns conformed to the latter trends. Thus, individual area of influence was small (within a radius of 3-5 m). Rarer species were more clumped than common species. Weak competitive thinning occurred among more densely packed small trees (<20 cm DBH), and rapidly disappeared with increasing tree size and distance from an individual. The clumping and density of individuals was not significantly affected by tree size. Conclusions: Negative effects of competition among trees are weak, occur within the crown radius of most individuals, and are independent of adult tree size and identity. The density of neighbouring trees(aggregation) did not decline with increasing focal tree size at either the conspecific or the community level and tree diameter (tree size) was not a good estimator of the implied competitive influence of a tree. Mechanisms operating at the recruitmentstage may be important determinants of adult tree community diversity and spacing patterns.
机译:问题:单个树木的影响面积是否由树木大小决定?从相邻树木之间的空间格局推断出的竞争是否会影响热带森林中成年树的间距格局?邻居之间的竞争在什么规模或等级上最有可能影响成年树的间距模式?地点:乌干达西部的基巴莱国家公园。方法:使用点模式分析,在4公顷永久性样地中,焦点树大小与最近的邻居距离,大小,密度和物种之间的关系。结果:我们发现最近的树邻居的分布是非随机的(茎> 10 cm DBH)。与身份无关,树木密度最高,并且邻居之间的间距通常为3-5m。树木密度较低,并且在距离> 5m时相对恒定,并且邻居通常是随机分布的。通常,同种模式符合后一种趋势。因此,单个影响区域很小(在3-5 m的半径内)。稀有物种比常见物种更富集。较弱的竞争性稀疏发生在密度更高的密集小树木(<20 cm DBH)中,并且随着树木的大小和与个体的距离增加而迅速消失。树木的大小并没有显着影响个体的聚集和密度。结论:树木间竞争的负面影响微弱,发生在大多数人的树冠半径内,并且与成年树木的大小和身份无关。无论是在树种还是在社区水平上,邻近树木的密度(聚集度)都不会随焦点树尺寸的增加而下降,树木的直径(树木尺寸)并不是对树木隐含竞争影响的良好估计。在募集阶段运作的机制可能是决定成年树群落多样性和间距模式的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号