...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vector borne diseases >A comparative study between the efficacy of systemic meglumine antimoniate therapy with standard or low dose plus oral omeprazole in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.
【24h】

A comparative study between the efficacy of systemic meglumine antimoniate therapy with standard or low dose plus oral omeprazole in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.

机译:标准或低剂量全身口服葡甲胺锑酸盐治疗联合口服奥美拉唑治疗皮肤利什曼病的疗效比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Pentavalent antimony compounds are the first line of drugs in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. However, because of their potential toxic effects, many investigations are performed to find an effective and safe treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis patients. Our objective in this investigation was to compare the effect of oral omeprazole and low dose systemic meglumine antimoniate (MA) and standard dose of systemic MA in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. METHODS: This was a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. In 150 patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis who were randomly divided into three groups and were treated with: (i) MA 60 mg/kg/day/ IM and oral placebo for three weeks; (ii) MA 30 mg/kg/day/IM and oral omeprazole 40 mg/day for three weeks; and (iii) MA 30 mg/kg/day/IM and oral placebo for three weeks. All the patients were visited every two weeks from the beginning of the trial up to six weeks and then at 8 and 12 weeks. The effectiveness of the treatment was classified in three levels as complete response, partial response and no response. Data were analyzed by SPSS 10 using KI square, Mann-Whitney, Kaplan-Mayer and ANOVA tests. RESULTS: Rate of complete response for three months (12 weeks) after starting the treatments was 93% for the group treated with standard dose of glucantime and placebo, 89% for the group treated with omeprazole and low dose glucantime and 80% for the group treated with low dose glucantime and placebo and these differences were significant (p < 0.05). The highest response rate was for the group treated with standard dose of glucantime and placebo. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Although oral omeprazole and low dose of systemic MA showed less efficacy in comparison to standard dose of systemic MA in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis, it still can be considered as a replacement therapy in high risk patients (such as patients with heart, kidney and/or liver disease) under close supervision of physician.
机译:背景与目的:五价锑化合物是治疗皮肤利什曼病的第一线药物。然而,由于其潜在的毒性作用,进行了许多研究以找到针对皮肤利什曼病患者的有效和安全的治疗方法。我们在这项研究中的目的是比较口服奥美拉唑和低剂量全身性葡甲胺氯胺酸(MA)和标准剂量全身性MA在治疗皮肤利什曼病中的作用。方法:这是一项随机双盲临床试验。在150名皮肤利什曼病患者中,将其随机分为三组,并接受以下治疗:(i)60 mg / kg / day / IM的IM和口服安慰剂3周; (ii)30毫克/千克/天/ IM和口服奥美拉唑40毫克/天,持续三周; (iii)每天30 mg / kg /天/ IM和口服安慰剂3周。从试验开始到两周,每两周对所有患者进行一次随访,然后在8周和12周进行随访。治疗的有效性分为完全缓解,部分缓解和无缓解三个级别。通过SPSS 10使用KI平方,Mann-Whitney,Kaplan-Mayer和ANOVA测试分析数据。结果:开始治疗后三个月(12周)的完全缓解率,标准剂量的葡聚糖和安慰剂治疗组为93%,奥美拉唑和低剂量葡聚糖治疗组为89%,该组为80%用低剂量葡聚糖和安慰剂治疗后,这些差异具有显着性(p <0.05)。最高反应率是用标准剂量葡聚糖和安慰剂治疗的组。结论与结论:尽管口服奥美拉唑和低剂量全身性MA相比标准剂量的全身性MA治疗皮肤利什曼病的疗效较差,但仍可被认为是高危患者(例如心脏病患者)的替代疗法。 ,肾脏和/或肝脏疾病)在医生的密切监督下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号