首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vector borne diseases >Field evaluation of biolarvicides in Surat city, India.
【24h】

Field evaluation of biolarvicides in Surat city, India.

机译:印度苏拉特市杀生物杀虫剂的现场评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Two bacterial larvicide (bio-larvicide) formulations--Bacticide and VectoBac containing viable endospores and delta endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis var israelensis H-14 were evaluated in 2001 for their mosquito larvicidal efficacy under the operational conditions of urban malaria control programme in Surat city, India. METHODS: Larvicides were applied at the recommended dose in selected breeding habitats of Anopheles (An. stephensi), Aedes (Ae. aegypti) and Culex (Cx. quinquefasciatus) and reductions in the densities of III and IV instars were compared with that of untreated matched controls. RESULTS : At the construction sites in cemented tanks/chambers VectoBac produced reduction in the density of III and IV instar larvae of An. stephensi (98-100%) and Ae. aegypti (100%) in the first week of application whereas Bacticide produced 71-100% reduction in An. stephensi and 100% in Ae. aegypti. Re-application of VectoBac on Day 10 caused better control up to Day 20 when compared with Bacticide. In stagnant water pools, VectoBac produced 27.6-85.3% reduction in the larvae of An. subpictus and 18.5-83.8% in those of Cx. quinquefasciatus whereas Bacticide produced 23.3-30.3% and 39-97.2% reduction in An. subpictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus larval densities in the first week post application, respectively. Bacticide application gave better impact on Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae in the second week after re-application as compared to VectoBac. In storm water drains, VectoBac caused respectively 6.2-100% and 6.4-97.6% reduction in An. subpictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae in the first week of application whereas Bacticide produced 100% and 13.3-98.8% reduction in An. subpictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus larval densities, respectively. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Both the formulations were equally effective on An. subpictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae after a second application. The results showed that application of these biolarvicides would be required at 7-10 day intervals. The health workers engaged in the application of biolarvicides reported a better ease of handling and application of the liquid formulation (VectoBac) than the wettable powder formulation (Bacticide).
机译:背景与目的:2001年评估了两种杀幼虫剂(生物杀幼虫剂)-含有苏云金芽孢杆菌H-14的活内孢子和δ内毒素的Bacticide和VectoBac在城市疟疾控制计划的操作条件下的灭蚊效果。在印度苏拉特市。方法:以推荐剂量将杀幼虫剂施用于按蚊(An。stephensi),伊蚊(Aees aegypti)和库蚊(Clex。quinquefasciatus)的选定繁殖生境中,并比较三龄和四龄幼虫密度的降低与未处理匹配的控件。结果:在水泥水箱/室内的施工现场,VectoBac降低了An的III和IV龄幼虫的密度。史蒂芬斯(98-100%)和Ae。施用第一周埃及伊蚊(100%),而Bacticide的An减少71-100%。 stephensi和100%的Ae。埃及。与Bacticide相比,在第10天重新使用VectoBac可以更好地控制直至第20天。在停滞的水池中,VectoBac使An的幼虫减少了27.6-85.3%。亚种和Cx的18.5-83.8%。 quinquefasciatus而Bacticide的An减少了23.3-30.3%和39-97.2%。 subpictus和Cx。施用后第一个星期分别有quinquefasciatus幼虫密度。杀菌剂的使用对Cx有更好的影响。与VectoBac相比,重新施用后第二周的quinquefasciatus幼虫。在雨水排水管中,VectoBac分别导致An降低6.2-100%和6.4-97.6%。 subpictus和Cx。在施用的第一周中,昆卡法西亚虫幼虫的体重降低了100%,而Bacticide的An降低了13.3-98.8%。 subpictus和Cx。 quinquefasciatus幼虫密度分别。解释与结论:两种制剂对An的效果相同。 subpictus和Cx。第二次施用后,quinquefasciatus幼虫。结果表明,将需要每隔7-10天施用这些生物杀幼虫剂。从事生物杀幼虫剂应用的卫生工作者报告说,液体制剂(VectoBac)比可湿性粉剂(Bacticide)更容易处理和施用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号