【24h】

Structural modeling of contrast sensitivity in adulthood

机译:成年期对比敏感度的结构模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Structural equation modeling was used to assess the utility of the sensorineural model of contrast sensitivity proposed by Sekuler et al. [Vision Res. 24, 689 (1984)] to account for spatial vision in adulthood. In Study 1, visual acuity and contrast sensitivity (1.5-18 c/deg) were measured in 84 people between the ages of 19 and 81 yr. No three-filter model fitted the data well. Although a two-filter model was associated with good fit indices, parameter estimates for both filters were inconsistent with physiological and behavioral data. In Study 2, acuity and contrast sensitivity (1.5-18 c/deg) were assessed in 95 observers between the ages of 23 and 73 yr. All measures were gathered once per month over a three-month period. The Sekuler et al. three-filter model did not fit the data from any time of measure, but a two-filter, bandpass model provided a consistent and excellent fit for all three waves. The model suggests that age-related change in the neural mechanisms underlying contrast sensitivity is minimal once acuity is controlled. Discrepancies between this conclusion and that reported by Sekuler et al, may be related to test type, psychophysical method, reliability, and sample selection.
机译:使用结构方程模型来评估Sekuler等人提出的对比敏感度的感觉神经模型的实用性。 [Vision Res。 24,689(1984)]来解释成年期的空间视觉。在研究1中,对84位19岁至81岁的人的视敏度和对比敏感度(1.5-18 c / deg)进行了测量。没有三个过滤器模型可以很好地拟合数据。尽管两个过滤器模型具有良好的拟合指数,但两个过滤器的参数估计值均与生理和行为数据不一致。在研究2中,对年龄在23至73岁之间的95位观察者进行了敏锐度和对比敏感度(1.5-18 c / deg)评估。在三个月的时间内,每月收集一次所有措施。 Sekuler等。三滤波器模型不适合任何测量时间的数据,但是两滤波器带通模型为所有三个波提供了一致且出色的拟合。该模型表明,一旦控制了敏锐度,对比敏感度背后的神经机制中与年龄相关的变化就很小。该结论与Sekuler等人报告的结论之间的差异可能与测试类型,心理物理方法,可靠性和样本选择有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号