...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Chinese Medical Association: JCMA >Sequential therapy with capecitabine followed by vinorelbine/cisplatin in patients with anthracycline/taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer.
【24h】

Sequential therapy with capecitabine followed by vinorelbine/cisplatin in patients with anthracycline/taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer.

机译:卡培他滨联合长春瑞滨/顺铂序贯治疗蒽环类/紫杉烷难治性转移性乳腺癌患者。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no standard treatment for patients with anthracycline and taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Capecitabine or vinorelbine plus cisplatin is an effective palliative regimen for taxane-refractory MBC. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of sequential therapy with capecitabine followed by biweekly vinorelbine plus cisplatin in 37 patients with anthracycline and taxane-refractory MBC in Taipei Veterans General Hospital. METHODS: Capecitabine (2,500 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest) was repeated every 3 weeks until the disease progressed. Patients then received biweekly vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) plus cisplatin (40 mg/m2) (arm A, n = 17) or best supportive care (BSC) (arm B, n = 20) in accordance with patient preference and clinical judgment. The clinical variables and response to capecitabine were well balanced in both arms. RESULTS: The overall response rate to capecitabine was 32%, with a complete response rate of 5% and a partial response rate of 27%. Stable disease was achieved in an additional 46%. The disease control rate with capecitabine was 78%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival with capecitabine were 5.9 and 9.5 months, respectively. There was a trend toward better overall survival in arm A patients compared with arm B (BSC) patients, though statistical significance was not reached (10.4 vs. 7.4 months; p = 0.08); however, a significantly better overall survival rate was observed in the subgroup with capecitabine-controlled disease (10.8 vs. 6.9 months; p = 0.015). The safety profile of vinorelbine/cisplatin was acceptable: only 6% developed grade 4 neutropenia. CONCLUSION: We suggest that sequential therapy is not necessarily effective compared with capecitabine alone, but is probably effective in patients initially controllable with capecitabine.
机译:背景:目前,蒽环类和紫杉烷类难治性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者尚无标准治疗方法。卡培他滨或长春瑞滨加顺铂是紫杉烷难治性MBC的有效姑息治疗方案。在这项研究中,我们分析了在台北退伍军人总医院对37例蒽环类和紫杉烷类难治性MBC患者采用卡培他滨联合双周长春瑞滨联合顺铂序贯治疗的疗效和毒性。方法:每3周重复卡培他滨(2,500 mg / m2,每天两次,连续2周,然后休息1周),直至疾病进展。然后,根据患者的喜好和临床判断,患者每两周接受长春瑞滨(25 mg / m2)加顺铂(40 mg / m2)(A组,n = 17)或最佳支持治疗(BSC)(B组,n = 20)。 。两组的临床变量和对卡培他滨的反应均很平衡。结果:卡培他滨的总缓解率为32%,完全缓解率为5%,部分缓解率为27%。另有46%的人获得了稳定的疾病。卡培他滨的疾病控制率为78%。卡培他滨的中位无进展生存期和总生存期分别为5.9个月和9.5个月。尽管未达到统计学显着性(10.4 vs. 7.4个月; p = 0.08),但与B组(BSC)患者相比,A组患者总体生存率有提高的趋势。但是,在卡培他滨控制的疾病亚组中观察到了明显更高的总生存率(10.8 vs. 6.9个月; p = 0.015)。长春瑞滨/顺铂的安全性是可以接受的:只有6%的患者发展为4级中性粒细胞减少症。结论:我们建议序贯治疗与单用卡培他滨相比不一定有效,但对最初可被卡培他滨控制的患者可能有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号