...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Use of an online curriculum to teach delirium to fourth-year medical students: A comparison with lecture format
【24h】

Use of an online curriculum to teach delirium to fourth-year medical students: A comparison with lecture format

机译:使用在线课程向四年级医学生教授ir妄:与授课形式的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Web-based learning methods are being used increasingly to teach core curriculum in medical school clerkships, but few studies have compared the effectiveness of online methods with that of live lectures in teaching the same topics to students. Boston University School of Medicine has implemented an online, case-based, interactive curriculum using videos and text to teach delirium to fourth-year medical students during their required 1-month Geriatrics and Home Medical Care clerkship. A control group of 56 students who received a 1-hour live delirium lecture only was compared with 111 intervention group students who completed the online delirium curriculum only. Evaluation consisted of a short-answer test with two cases given as a pre- and posttest to both groups. The total possible maximum test score was 34 points, and the lowest possible score was -8 points. Mean pre- and posttest scores were 10.5 ± 4.0 and 12.7 ± 4.4, respectively, in the intervention group and 9.9 ± 3.5 and 11.2 ± 4.5, respectively, in the control group. The intervention group had statistically significant improvement between the pre- and posttest scores (2.21-point difference; P <.001), as did the control group (1.36-point difference; P =.03); the difference in test score improvement between the two groups was not statistically significant. An interactive case-based online curriculum in delirium is as effective as a live lecture in teaching delirium, although neither of these educational methods alone produces robust increases in knowledge.
机译:基于网络的学习方法正越来越多地用于医学院校文员的核心课程教学,但是很少有研究将在线方法与现场讲座在向学生教授相同主题方面的有效性进行比较。波士顿大学医学院已经实施了一个基于案例的在线互动课程,该课程使用视频和文本在四年制医学生需要的1个月老年医学和家庭医疗服务期间向del四年级学生进行del妄训练。对照组中仅接受1小时实时received妄讲座的56名学生与111名仅完成在线del妄课程的干预组学生进行了比较。评估包括一个简短答案测试,两个案例分别作为两组的前测和后测。最高可能的总得分是34分,最低可能得分是-8分。干预组的测试前和测试后平均得分分别为10.5±4.0和12.7±4.4,对照组的平均测试得分分别为9.9±3.5和11.2±4.5。干预组的测试前后得分之间有统计学上的显着改善(2.21分; P <.001),对照组也有统计学意义(1.36分; P = .03)。两组之间的考试成绩改善差异无统计学意义。 ir妄互动式基于案例的在线课程与teaching妄教学的现场讲座一样有效,尽管这两种教育方法都不能单独带来强劲的知识增长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号