首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry >Suicide attempt characteristics, diagnoses, and future attempts: comparing multiple attempters to single attempters and ideators.
【24h】

Suicide attempt characteristics, diagnoses, and future attempts: comparing multiple attempters to single attempters and ideators.

机译:自杀尝试的特征,诊断和未来尝试:将多个尝试者与单个尝试者和理想主义者进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare psychiatric diagnoses and future suicide attempt outcomes of multiple attempters (MAs), single attempters (SAs), and ideators. METHOD: Two hundred twenty-eight teens who reported recent ideation or a lifetime suicide attempt in a screening of 1,729 high school students completed the Adolescent Suicide Interview, which provided information on attempt number and characteristics and mood, anxiety, and substance use disorder modules of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children; 191 were reinterviewed 4 to 6 years later to ascertain interval attempts and psychiatric disorder. Between screening and follow-up, 33 (17%) teens made an attempt, 12 of whom were previously classified as lifetime MAs (more than one attempt) and six as SAs. RESULTS: MAs more often met criteria for any one of the DSM diagnoses assessed at baseline (mood, anxiety, or substance use disorder; 71%), compared with SAs (39%) and ideators (41%), and at follow-up (mood, anxiety, substance use, or disruptive behavior disorder; 69%) compared with SAs (36%) (p <.05). As reported at baseline, MAs (versus SAs) more often wished to die during their attempt (53% versus 23%), less often planned their attempt for intervention (44% versus 76%), and more often regretted recovery (26% versus 7%; p <.05). Baseline MAs had significantly higher odds of making a later attempt compared to ideators (odds ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.5-10.2) and SAs (odds ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 1.0-20.2). No participants committed suicide during follow-up. SAs who made another attempt (versus those who did not) more often met criteria for a baseline anxiety disorder and more often wished to die during their baseline attempt. CONCLUSIONS: MAs more strongly predict later suicidality and diagnosis than SAs and ideation. Forms that assess past suicide attempts should routinely inquire about frequency of attempts. The similarity between the present findings and those of clinical samples suggests that screening may yield a representative sample of suicide attempters and ideators.
机译:目的:比较多种尝试者(MA),单尝试者(SA)和思想者的精神病诊断和未来自杀尝试的结局。方法:228名青少年在对1,729名高中生进行筛查后报告了最近的想法或一生的自杀企图,他们完成了《青少年自杀访谈》,其中提供了有关尝试次数,特征,情绪,焦虑和物质使用障碍模块的信息。诊断性儿童面试时间表; 4至6年后对191例患者进行了重新访谈,以确定间隔时间和精神疾病。在筛查和随访之间,有33(17%)名青少年尝试过,其中12名以前被归类为终生MA(超过一次尝试),六名为SA。结果:MAs更符合基线时评估的任何一种DSM诊断标准(情绪,焦虑或物质使用障碍; 71%),而SAs(39%)和意识形态(41%)以及随访(情绪,焦虑,药物滥用或破坏性行为障碍; 69%)相较于SAs(36%)(p <.05)。根据基线报告,MA(相对于SA)在尝试期间更希望死亡(53%对23%),对干预计划的尝试更少(44%对76%),更遗憾的是康复(26%对7%; p <.05)。基线MA比起意识者(优势比4.0,95%置信区间1.5-10.2)和SA(优势比4.6,95%置信区间1.0-20.2)进行后期尝试的可能性要高得多。随访期间没有参与者自杀。进行另一次尝试的SA(相对于未尝试SA的SA)更经常符合基线焦虑症的标准,并且更希望在其基线尝试中死亡。结论:与SA和构想相比,MA更有力地预测以后的自杀和诊断。评估过去自杀未遂的表格应常规询问自杀未遂的频率。本研究结果与临床样本之间的相似性表明,筛查可能产生自杀企图者和思想家的代表性样本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号