首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association >Evaluation of the perioperative analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine, compared with butorphanol, in cats
【24h】

Evaluation of the perioperative analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine, compared with butorphanol, in cats

机译:丁丙诺啡与布托啡诺相比对猫围术期镇痛效果的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective—To compare the analgesic effects of buprenorphine and butorphanol in domestic cats.Design—2-phase positive-controlled randomized masked clinical trial.Animals—39 healthy female cats (10 in phase 1 and 29 in phase 2).Procedures—Cats admitted for ovariohysterectomy received buprenorphine (4 in phase 1; 14 in phase 2) or butorphanol (6in phase 1; 15 in phase 2). In phase 1, cats were premedi-cated with buprenorphine (0.02 mg/kg [0.009 mg/lb], IM) or butorphanol (0.4 mg/kg [0.18 mg/lb], IM), in combination with medetomidine. Anesthesia was induced with propofol (IV) and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. After extubation, medetomidine was antagonized with atipamezole. A validated multidimensional composite scale was used to assess signs of pain after surgery starting 20 minutes after extubation and continuing for up to 360 minutes, and pain score comparisons were made between the 2 groups. Phase 2 proceeded similar to phase 1 with the following addition: during wound closure, cats from the butorphanol and buprenorphine groups received butorphanol (0.4 mg/kg, IM) or buprenorphine(0.02 mg/kg, IM), respectively.Results—Phase 1 of the study was stopped after 10 cats were ovariohysterectomized because 9 of 10 cats reguired rescue analgesia at the first evaluation. In phase 2, at the first pain evaluation, pain scores from the buprenorphine group were lower, andall cats from the butorphanol group reguired rescue analgesia. None of the cats from the buprenorphine group reguired rescue analgesia at any time.Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Buprenorphine (0.02 mg/kg, IM) given before surgery and during wound closure provided adeguate analgesia for 6 hours following ovariohysterectomy in cats, whereas butorphanol did not. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014;245:195-202)
机译:目的—比较丁丙诺啡和丁苯啡诺对家猫的镇痛作用。设计— 2期阳性对照随机掩盖临床试验。动物— 39只健康的雌性猫(1期10只,2期29只)。对于卵巢子宫切除术,接受丁丙诺啡(1期为4; 2期为14)或布托啡诺(1期为6; 2期为15)。在阶段1中,对猫用丁丙诺啡(0.02 mg / kg [0.009 mg / lb],IM)或丁啡诺尔(0.4 mg / kg [0.18 mg / lb],IM)和美托咪定联合用药。用异丙酚(IV)诱导麻醉,并用异氟烷在氧气中维持麻醉。拔管后,将美托咪定与阿哌咪唑拮抗。使用经验证的多维综合量表评估拔管后20分钟开始并持续长达360分钟的术后疼痛征象,并在两组之间进行疼痛评分比较。第2阶段与第1阶段相似,但增加了以下内容:伤口闭合期间,来自butorphanol和buprenorphine组的猫分别接受了butorphanol(0.4 mg / kg,IM)或buprenorphine(0.02 mg / kg,IM)。结果-阶段1 10只猫经卵巢子宫切除术后停止了这项研究,因为10只猫中有9只在首次评估时要求进行镇痛。在第2阶段中,在首次疼痛评估中,丁丙诺啡组的疼痛评分较低,而丁啡诺组的所有猫均要求进行抢救镇痛。结论:丁丙诺啡组在手术前和伤口闭合期间给予丁丙诺啡(6 mg / kg)止痛镇痛效果达6小时。不。 (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014; 245:195-202)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号