首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Results of interval debulking surgery compared with primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian cancer.
【24h】

Results of interval debulking surgery compared with primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian cancer.

机译:与晚期卵巢癌的原发性减脂术相比,间歇性减脂术的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Results of IDS (after three to four courses of induction chemotherapy) were compared with PDS followed by chemotherapy in patients treated for advanced stage ovarian cancer (stage IIIC or IV). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was done on a group of 57 patients who underwent IDS (because of an unresectable tumor) compared with a group of 28 patients treated with PDS (for resectable disease) followed by chemotherapy. All patients were treated between 1996 and 2001 by the same team of surgeons and received the same regimen of chemotherapy (platinum based plus paclitaxel). RESULTS: Optimal cytoreductive surgery (residual disease < or = 2 cm) was achieved in IDS and PDS groups in 84% (48 of 57) and 100% (28 of 28) of patients, respectively. Complete resection was observed in 51% (29 of 57) of patients in the IDS group and 54% (15 of 28) of patients in the PDS group. The rates of bowel resection, large peritoneal resection, and postoperative morbidity were significantly reduced in the IDS group. After adjusting for the size of residual disease (< or /= 2 cm and absence of residual tumor), overall and event-free survival were not different in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Survival rates were similar in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer who underwent IDS or PDS. The rates of surgical resection and morbidity were reduced after IDS. IDS can be safely used in unresectable advanced stage ovarian cancer.
机译:背景:在晚期卵巢癌(IIIC或IV期)治疗的患者中,将IDS的结果(三到四个疗程的诱导化疗后)与PDS进行化疗后进行比较。研究设计:回顾性研究对57例接受IDS(由于无法切除的肿瘤)的患者进行了比较,而对28例接受PDS(针对可切除疾病)的患者进行了化疗。在1996年至2001年之间,所有患者均由同一组外科医生治疗,并接受了相同的化疗方案(铂类加上紫杉醇)。结果:IDS和PDS组分别达到84%(57个中的48个)和100%(28个中的28个)的最佳细胞减灭术(残留疾病<或= 2 cm)。 IDS组的患者中有51%(57人中的29人)和PDS组的54%(28人中的15人)完全切除。 IDS组的肠切除率,大腹膜切除率和术后发病率显着降低。调整残留疾病的大小(≤2 cm且无残留肿瘤)后,两组的总体生存率和无事件生存率无差异。结论:接受IDS或PDS治疗的晚期卵巢癌患者的生存率相似。 IDS后手术切除率和发病率降低。 IDS可安全用于不可切除的晚期卵巢癌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号