...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Evaluation of ranolazine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic stable angina: Results from the TERISA randomized clinical trial (Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects with Chronic Stable Angina)
【24h】

Evaluation of ranolazine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic stable angina: Results from the TERISA randomized clinical trial (Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects with Chronic Stable Angina)

机译:雷诺嗪对2型糖尿病和慢性稳定型心绞痛患者的评估:TERISA随机临床试验的结果(雷诺嗪对慢性稳定型心绞痛受试者的2型糖尿病评估)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: This study sought to examine the efficacy of ranolazine versus placebo on weekly angina frequency and sublingual nitroglycerin use in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease (CAD), and chronic stable angina who remain symptomatic despite treatment with up to 2 antianginal agents. Background: Patients with diabetes have more extensive CAD than those without diabetes, and a high burden of angina. Ranolazine is not only effective in treating angina but also may improve glycemic control, thus providing several potential benefits in this high-risk group. We conducted a randomized trial to test the antianginal benefit of ranolazine in patients with diabetes and stable angina. Methods: TERISA (Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects With Chronic Stable Angina) was an international, randomized, double-blind trial of ranolazine versus placebo in patients with diabetes, CAD, and stable angina treated with 1 to 2 antianginals. After a single-blind, 4-week placebo run-in, patients were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind ranolazine (target dose 1000 mg bid) or placebo. Anginal episodes and nitroglycerin use were recorded with daily entry into a novel electronic diary. Primary outcome was the average weekly number of anginal episodes over the last 6 weeks of the study. Results: A total of 949 patients were randomized across 104 centers in 14 countries. Mean age was 64 years, 61% were men, mean diabetes duration was 7.5 years, and mean baseline HbA1c was 7.3%. Electronic diary data capture was 98% in both groups. Weekly angina frequency was significantly lower with ranolazine versus placebo (3.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.6 to 4.1] episodes vs. 4.3 [95% CI: 4.0 to 4.5] episodes, p = 0.008), as was the weekly sublingual nitroglycerin use (1.7 [95% CI: 1.6 to 1.9] doses vs. 2.1 [95% CI: 1.9 to 2.3] doses, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the incidence of serious adverse events between groups. Conclusions: Among patients with diabetes and chronic angina despite treatment with up to 2 agents, ranolazine reduced angina and sublingual nitroglycerin use and was well tolerated. (Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects With Chronic Stable Angina [TERISA]; NCT01425359)
机译:目的:本研究旨在探讨雷诺嗪与安慰剂对每周2型糖尿病,冠心病(CAD)和慢性稳定型心绞痛患者的心绞痛发作频率和舌下硝酸甘油使用的疗效,尽管接受了2种抗心绞痛的治疗仍保持症状代理商。背景:糖尿病患者的CAD比没有糖尿病的患者更为广泛,并且心绞痛的负担也很高。雷诺嗪不仅有效治疗心绞痛,而且可以改善血糖控制,因此在该高危人群中具有多种潜在益处。我们进行了一项随机试验,以测试雷诺嗪对糖尿病和稳定型心绞痛患者的抗心绞痛作用。方法:TERISA(雷诺嗪对慢性稳定型心绞痛患者的2型糖尿病评估)是雷诺嗪与安慰剂对1至2种抗心绞痛药物治疗的糖尿病,CAD和稳定型心绞痛患者的一项国际随机,双盲试验。在单盲,为期4周的安慰剂磨合后,将患者随机分为8周的双盲雷诺嗪(目标剂量为1000 mg bid)或安慰剂。每天输入一本新型电子日记记录心绞痛发作和硝酸甘油的使用。主要结局是研究的最后6周内平均每周心绞痛发作次数。结果:总共949名患者被随机分配到14个国家的104个中心中。平均年龄为64岁,男性为61%,平均糖尿病持续时间为7.5年,平均基线HbA1c为7.3%。两组的电子日记数据捕获率为98%。雷诺嗪与安慰剂相比,每周心绞痛发生率显着降低(3.8 [95%置信区间(CI):3.6至4.1]发作,而4.3 [95%CI:4.0至4.5]发作,p = 0.008),而舌下每周一次使用硝酸甘油(1.7 [95%CI:1.9至2.3]剂量与2.1 [95%CI:1.9至2.3]剂量,p = 0.003)。两组之间严重不良事件的发生率没有差异。结论:在糖尿病和慢性心绞痛患者中,尽管使用了两种药物治疗,雷诺嗪可减少心绞痛和舌下硝化甘油的使用,并且耐受性良好。 (雷诺嗪对慢性稳定型心绞痛患者的2型糖尿病评估[TERISA]; NCT01425359)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号