...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sport rehabilitation >The Effectiveness of Open Repair Versus Percutaneous Repair for an Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture
【24h】

The Effectiveness of Open Repair Versus Percutaneous Repair for an Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

机译:开放修复与经皮修复对急性跟腱断裂的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Clinical Scenario: There are 2 approaches available for surgical repair of the Achilles tendon: open or percutaneous. However, there is controversy over which repair is superior. Focused Clinical Question: Which type of surgery is better in providing the best overall patient outcome, open or percutaneous repair, in physically active men and women with acute Achilles tendon ruptures? Summary of Search, "Best Evidence" Appraised, and Key Findings: The literature was searched for studies of level 3 evidence or higher that investigated the effectiveness of open repair versus percutaneous repair on acute Achilles tendon ruptures in physically active men and women. The literature search resulted in 3 studies for possible inclusion. All 3 good-quality studies were included. Clinical Bottom Line: There is supporting evidence to indicate that percutaneous repair is the best option for Achilles tendon surgery when it comes to the physically active population. Percutaneous repair has faster surgery times, less risk of complications, and faster recovery times over having an open repair, although it is acknowledged that every patient has a different situation and best individual option may vary patient to patient.
机译:临床场景:有两种方法可以用于跟腱的手术修复:开放式或经皮。但是,对于哪种维修效果更好,存在争议。有针对性的临床问题:对于患有体育活动的急性跟腱断裂的男性和女性,哪种手术更能为患者提供最佳的总体开放或经皮修复效果?检索摘要,评估的“最佳证据”和主要发现:检索文献以研究3级或以上证据,这些研究调查了在体育活动活跃的男性和女性中,急性皮肤跟腱断裂进行开放式修复与经皮修复的有效性。文献检索得出3项可能纳入的研究。所有3项高质量研究均包括在内。临床底线:有支持证据表明,对于有身体活动的人群,经皮修复是跟腱手术的最佳选择。经皮修补术比开放式修补术具有更快的手术时间,更少的并发症风险和更快的恢复时间,尽管众所周知,每个患者的情况都不尽相同,最佳个人选择可能因患者而异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号