...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >Effects of different lifting cadences on ground reaction forces during the squat exercise.
【24h】

Effects of different lifting cadences on ground reaction forces during the squat exercise.

机译:深蹲运动过程中不同的起搏节奏对地面反作用力的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of different lifting cadences on the ground reaction force (GRF) during the squat exercise. Squats performed with greater acceleration will produce greater inertial forces; however, it is not well understood how different squat cadences affect GRF. The hypotheses were that faster squat cadences would result in greater peak GRF and that the contributions of the body and barbell, both of equivalent mass, to total system inertial force would not be different. Six experienced male subjects (31 +/- 4 years, 180 +/- 9 cm, 88.8 +/- 13.3 kg) performed 3 sets of 3 squats using 3 different cadences (fast cadence [FC] = 1-second descent/1-second ascent; medium cadence [MC] = 3-second descent/1-second ascent; and slow cadence [SC] = 4-second descent/2-second ascent) while lifting a barbell mass equal to their body mass. Ground reaction force and velocity sensor data were used to calculate inertial force contributions of both the body and barbell to total inertial force. Peak GRF were significantly higher in FC squats compared to MC (p = 0.0002) and SC (p = 0.0002). Ranges of GRF were also significantly higher in FC compared to MC (p < 0.05) and higher in MC compared to SC (p < 0.05). The inertial forces associated with the body were larger than those associated with the barbell, regardless of cadence. Faster squat cadences result in significantly greater peak GRF as a result of the inertia of the system. This study demonstrates that GRF was more dependent on descent cadence than on ascent cadence and that researchers should not use a single point on the body to approximate the location of the center of mass during squat exercise analysis.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定深蹲运动过程中不同的提升节奏对地面反作用力(GRF)的影响。以更大的加速度进行深蹲会产生更大的惯性力。然而,人们尚不了解不同的下蹲节奏如何影响GRF。假设是,较快的下蹲节奏将导致更大的GRF峰值,并且相等质量的身体和杠铃对总系统惯性力的贡献不会不同。六名经验丰富的男性受试者(31 +/- 4岁,180 +/- 9厘米,88.8 +/- 13.3公斤)使用3种不同的节奏(快速节奏[FC] = 1秒下降/ 1-第二次上升;中等节奏[MC] = 3秒钟下降/ 1秒上升;慢节奏[SC] = 4秒钟下降/ 2秒上升),同时举起等于其体重的杠铃。地面反作用力和速度传感器数据用于计算身体和杠铃对总惯性力的惯性力贡献。与MC(p = 0.0002)和SC(p = 0.0002)相比,FC下蹲的GRF峰值明显更高。与MC相比,FC的GRF范围也显着更高(p <0.05),而与SC相比,MC的GRF范围也更高(p <0.05)。无论踏频如何,与身体相关的惯性力都大于与杠铃相关的惯性力。由于系统的惯性,较快的下蹲节奏会导致明显更大的峰值GRF。这项研究表明,GRF对下降节奏的依赖性要大于对上升节奏的依赖性,并且在进行深蹲运动分析时,研究人员不应使用身体上的单个点来估计质心的位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号