首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >SESSION RATINGS OF PERCEIVED EXERTION RESPONSES DURING RESISTANCE TRAINING BOUTS EQUATED FOR TOTAL WORK BUT DIFFERING IN WORK RATE
【24h】

SESSION RATINGS OF PERCEIVED EXERTION RESPONSES DURING RESISTANCE TRAINING BOUTS EQUATED FOR TOTAL WORK BUT DIFFERING IN WORK RATE

机译:等同于总工作量但工作率不同的阻力训练周期中感知到的运动反应的等级

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Kraft, JA, Green, JM, and Thompson, KR. Session ratings of perceived exertion responses during resistance training bouts equated for total work but differing in work rate. J Strength Cond Res 28(2): 540-545, 2014Session ratings of perceived exertion (SRPE) during resistance training may be influenced by specific exercise parameters. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of work rate (total work per unit time) and recording time on SRPE. Participants performed 3 exercise bouts of bench press, lat pull-down, overhead press, upright row, triceps extension, and biceps curl at 60% of predetermined 1 repetition maximum according to these protocols: (a) 3 sets x 8 repetitions (reps) x 1.5 minutes of recovery, (b) 3 sets x 8 reps x 3 minutes of recovery, and (c) 2 sets x 12 reps x 3 minutes of recovery. Session ratings of perceived exertion for the 3 x 8 x 1.5-minute recovery (5.3 +/- 1.8) and 2 x 12 x 3-minute recovery trials (6.2 +/- 1.7) were significantly greater vs. 3 x 8 x 3-minute recovery trial (4.2 +/- 1.8). The difference approached significance between work rate-matched protocols (p = 0.08). No difference was observed between SRPE at 15 minutes (5.1 +/- 1.8) vs. 30 minutes (5.2 +/- 1.9) post exercise. Post-set in-task ratings of perceived exertion were higher for the 2 x 12 x 3-minute recovery trial (5.9 +/- 1.4) vs. 3 x 8 x 1.5-minute recovery trial (4.8 +/- 1.2) and 3 x 8 x 3-minute recovery trial (4.0 +/- 1.6). The difference approached significance (p = 0.07) for the 3 x 8 x 3-minute recovery trial vs. 3 x 8 x 1.5-minute recovery trial. Session ratings of perceived exertion responded to changes in work rate with no significant difference at matched work rates, indicating that SRPE is responsive to training load. Results indicated that more proximal monitoring (15 minutes post exercise) yielded reliable estimates of SRPE increasing the practical utility of the measure.
机译:卡夫(JA),格林(JM)和汤普森(KR)。在阻力训练期间,感觉到的运动反应的会话等级与总工作量相等,但工作率不同。 J Strength Cond Res 28(2):540-545,2014年阻力训练过程中的运动感觉等级(SRPE)可能受特定运动参数的影响。这项研究的目的是检查工作率(每单位时间的总工作量)和记录时间对SRPE的影响。参与者按照以下规程以预定的1次重复最大值的60%进行了3次卧推,卧推,仰卧推举,直立划行,肱三头肌伸展和肱二头肌卷曲的运动:(a)3组x 8次重复x 1.5分钟的恢复时间,(b)3组x 8次x 3分钟恢复时间,(c)2组x 12次x 3分钟恢复时间。 3 x 8 x 1.5分钟恢复(5.3 +/- 1.8)和2 x 12 x 3分钟恢复试验(6.2 +/- 1.7)的感觉劳累的会话等级明显高于3 x 8 x 3-分钟恢复试用(4.2 +/- 1.8)。差异达到工作率匹配协议之间的显着性(p = 0.08)。运动后15分钟(5.1 +/- 1.8)与30分钟(5.2 +/- 1.9)的SRPE之间没有观察到差异。 2 x 12 x 3分钟恢复试验(5.9 +/- 1.4)的设定后任务中工作强度等级高于3 x 8 x 1.5分钟恢复试验(4.8 +/- 1.2)和3 x 8 x 3分钟恢复试用(4.0 +/- 1.6)。 3 x 8 x 3分钟恢复试验与3 x 8 x 1.5分钟恢复试验的差异接近显着性(p = 0.07)。感觉到的劳累的会话等级对工作率的变化有反应,在匹配的工作率下无显着差异,表明SRPE对训练负荷有响应。结果表明,更多的近端监测(运动后15分钟)可得出SRPE的可靠估计值,从而增加了该措施的实用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号