首页> 外文期刊>Clinical EEG and neuroscience: official journal of the EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society (ENCS) >A comparison among several P300 brain-computer interface speller paradigms.
【24h】

A comparison among several P300 brain-computer interface speller paradigms.

机译:几种P300脑机接口拼写范例之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since the brain-computer interface (BCI) speller was first proposed by Farwell and Donchin, there have been modifications in the visual aspects of P300 paradigms. Most of the changes are based on the original matrix format such as changes in the number of rows and columns, font size, flash/ blank time, and flash order. The improvement in the resulting accuracy and speed of such systems has always been the ultimate goal. In this study, we have compared several different speller paradigms including row-column, single character flashing, and two region-based paradigms which are not based on the matrix format. In the first region-based paradigm, at the first level, characters and symbols are distributed over seven regions alphabetically, while in the second region-based paradigm they are distributed in the most frequently used order. At the second level, each one of the regions is further subdivided into seven subsets. The experimental results showed that the average accuracy and user acceptability for two region-based paradigms were higher than those for traditional paradigms such as row/column and single character.
机译:自Farwell和Donchin首次提出脑机接口(BCI)拼写器以来,P300范例的视觉方面已有所改进。大多数更改基于原始矩阵格式,例如行和列数,字体大小,刷新/空白时间和刷新顺序的更改。最终提高此类系统的准确性和速度一直是最终目标。在这项研究中,我们比较了几种不同的拼写范例,包括行列,单字符闪烁和两个不基于矩阵格式的基于区域的范例。在第一个基于区域的范式中,在第一级,字符和符号按字母顺序分布在七个区域上,而在第二个基于区域的范式中,它们按最常用的顺序分布。在第二级,将每个区域进一步细分为七个子集。实验结果表明,两个基于区域的范式的平均准确性和用户接受度高于传统的范式(例如行/列和单个字符)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号