首页> 外文期刊>Journal of spinal disorders & techniques. >Comparison of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: Twelve-month follow-up in a prospective nonrandomized comparative study
【24h】

Comparison of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: Twelve-month follow-up in a prospective nonrandomized comparative study

机译:后凸成形术和椎体成形术治疗疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的比较:前瞻性非随机对照研究的十二个月随访

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective nonrandomized comparative study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) with respect to pain, functional outcome, radiomorphology, cement leakage, and incidence of new adjacent vertebral fracture. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty have become common treatments for painful osteoporotic VCFs. Although the benefits of either kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty compared with conservative treatment have been frequently discussed, few clinical studies are available that directly compare the 2 procedures. METHODS: Ninety-six patients with painful osteoporotic VCFs less than 4 weeks old were included and nonrandomly assigned to undergo kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty treatment. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale and the Oswestry Disability Index. Plain radiographs were analyzed to quantify spinal deformity correction (vertebral body height and kyphotic angle), and evaluate cement leakage and new adjacent vertebral fractures. The follow-up time was 12 months. RESULTS: The baseline clinical and radiological characteristics of both groups were comparable. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to improvement in pain and functional scores at all postoperative intervals. Vertebral height restoration and kyphotic angle reduction were achieved in both groups, but the correction of spinal deformity was more significant in the kyphoplasty group. Asymptomatic cement leakage occurred in 9.1% and 34.6% of treated vertebrae for the kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty groups, respectively. Three adjacent fractures in the kyphoplasty group and 2 in the vertebroplasty group were identified during the follow-up time, and no major adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty demonstrated similar good clinical outcomes during the 12-month follow-up. Kyphoplasty offers a higher degree of spinal deformity correction and results in less cement leakage than vertebroplasty. The benefits of these relative merits need to be ascertained in future long-term studies.
机译:研究设计:前瞻性非随机比较研究。目的:比较椎体后凸成形术和椎体成形术治疗疼痛的骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(VCF)的疼痛,功能结局,放射形态,骨水泥渗漏和新发相邻椎体骨折的发生率和安全性。背景数据总结:后凸成形术和椎体成形术已成为治疗疼痛性骨质疏松性VCF的常见方法。尽管后凸成形术或椎体成形术与保守治疗相比的好处已被广泛讨论,但很少有临床研究可直接比较这两种方法。方法:纳入96名年龄小于4周的疼痛性骨质疏松性VCF患者,并随机分配接受椎体后凸成形术或椎体成形术治疗。使用视觉模拟量表和Oswestry残疾指数评估临床结局。对普通X线片进行分析以量化脊柱畸形矫正(椎体高度和后凸角),并评估骨水泥渗漏和新的相邻椎体骨折。随访时间为12个月。结果:两组的基线临床和放射学特征具有可比性。两组在所有术后时间间隔的疼痛和功能评分改善方面均无显着差异。两组均实现了椎体高度的恢复和后凸角的减小,但在后凸成形术组中,脊柱畸形的矫正更为显着。后凸成形术组和椎骨成形术组分别有9.1%和34.6%的无症状骨水泥漏出。在随访期间,发现后凸成形术组中有3处相邻骨折,椎体成形术组中有2处骨折,未观察到重大不良事件。结论:椎体成形术和椎体成形术在12个月的随访期间显示出相似的良好临床结果。与椎体成形术相比,后凸成形术可提供更高程度的脊柱畸形矫正,并导致更少的骨水泥渗漏。这些相对优点的好处需要在以后的长期研究中确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号