...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research: JSLHR >Short-term memory (STM) constraints in children with specific language impairment (SLI): are there differences between receptive and expressive SLI?
【24h】

Short-term memory (STM) constraints in children with specific language impairment (SLI): are there differences between receptive and expressive SLI?

机译:患有特定语言障碍(SLI)的儿童的短期记忆(STM)限制:接受性SLI和表达性SLI之间是否有差异?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Specific language impairment (SLI) is assumed to be causally related to deficits in auditory short-term memory (STM). Although verbal STM deficits have been consistently found in SLI, the results of visual STM tests are inconsistent. Do these inconsistencies reflect different study populations of expressive SLI (ELI) and receptive-expressive SLI (R/ELI)? METHOD: Twenty-one children (ages 6-11) with ELI, 21 with R/ELI, and 21 controls (CG) matched on age and nonverbal intelligence were retrospectively compared with regard to their visual and auditory STM. RESULTS: ELI children and R/ELI children performed significantly poorer than the CG in auditory-verbal STM tests. On tests for visual STM (symbol sequences), the R/ELI children performed significantly poorer than the CG. For hand movements, children with R/ELI scored slightly poorer compared to both other groups but without reaching statistical significance. Correlation analyses showed significant associations between symbol sequences and receptive language measures. Regression analysis found that the scores of symbol sequences and digit sequences together accounted for 39% of the variance of the receptive language measures, whereas the scores for nonsense syllables accounted for 24% of the variance of the expressive language measures. CONCLUSION: R/ELI children appear to have more complex STM deficits, as they showed visual STM constraints in addition to auditory STM constraints.
机译:目的:特定语言障碍(SLI)被认为与听觉短期记忆(STM)的缺陷有因果关系。尽管在SLI中一直发现口语STM缺陷,但视觉STM测试的结果却不一致。这些不一致是否反映了表达SLI(ELI)和表达受体SLI(R / ELI)的不同研究人群?方法:回顾性地比较了21名年龄,非语言智力匹配的ELI儿童,6-11岁R / ELI儿童和21名对照组(CG)的视觉和听觉STM。结果:ELI儿童和R / ELI儿童在听觉-语言STM测试中的表现显着低于CG。在视觉STM(符号序列)测试中,R / ELI儿童的表现明显差于CG。对于手部动作,与其他两组相比,R / ELI儿童的得分稍差,但没有统计学意义。相关分析表明,符号序列与接受语言的度量之间存在显着关联。回归分析发现,符号序列和数字序列的分数共同构成了接受语言量度方差的39%,而无意义音节的分数则占了表达语言量度方差的24%。结论:R / ELI儿童似乎有更复杂的STM缺陷,因为他们除了听觉STM约束外还显示视觉STM约束。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号