...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research: JSLHR >Identifying prosodic contrasts in utterances produced by 4-, 7-, and 11-year-old children.
【24h】

Identifying prosodic contrasts in utterances produced by 4-, 7-, and 11-year-old children.

机译:识别4岁,7岁和11岁儿童所发话语的韵律对比。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Acquisition of prosodic control appears to evolve across development with younger children relying on durational cues and older children utilizing a broader spectrum of cues including fundamental frequency, intensity, and duration. This study aimed to determine whether unfamiliar listeners could identify prosodic contrasts produced by 4-, 7-, and 11-year-olds despite differences in acoustic cues used by each age group. METHOD: Thirty-six adult monolingual speakers of American English participated as listeners. A previous study yielded speech recordings from 12 children (2 male, 2 female from each age group) producing 2 linguistic contrasts, question-statement and contrastive stress, which served as listening stimuli. RESULTS: In both tasks, listener accuracy ranged from 39.7% to 100% with significant differences between 4-year-olds and both older age groups. Listeners had difficulty deciphering the 4-year-olds' questions compared with statements and were more accurate in identifying contrastive stress placed on sentence-initial words compared with sentence-final words across all age groups. CONCLUSION: Although listeners identified prosodic contrasts produced by all 3 age groups, accuracy was significantly higher for 7- and 11-year-old productions. Findings are consistent with production studies that suggest relative stabilization of prosodic control between ages 4 and 7. Parallels between prosodic and segmental acquisition are discussed.
机译:目的:随着年龄的增长,幼儿的声调控制的发展似乎不断发展,年幼的孩子依靠持续性的提示,而年龄较大的孩子则利用更广泛的提示范围,包括基本频率,强度和持续时间。这项研究旨在确定尽管每个年龄组使用的声音提示有所不同,但陌生的听众是否可以识别4岁,7岁和11岁儿童产生的韵律对比。方法:36位美国英语成人的单语讲者作为听众参加。先前的一项研究从12个孩子(每个年龄段的2个男性,每个年龄组2个女性)中产生了语音记录,产生了两种语言对比,问题陈述和对比压力,这些都是听觉刺激。结果:在这两项任务中,听众的准确度从39.7%到100%不等,四岁儿童和两个年龄段的人群之间都有显着差异。与陈述相比,听众难以理解4岁儿童的问题,并且与所有年龄组的最终句子单词相比,在识别句子初始单词上的对比压力时更为准确。结论:尽管听众确定了所有3个年龄组产生的韵律对比,但对于7岁和11岁的作品,其准确性明显更高。研究结果与生产研究相吻合,表明在4至7岁之间,韵律控制相对稳定。讨论了韵律和分段获取之间的平行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号