...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of palliative medicine >End-of-life care in the general wards of a Singaporean hospital: an Asian perspective.
【24h】

End-of-life care in the general wards of a Singaporean hospital: an Asian perspective.

机译:亚洲医院的观点:新加坡医院普通病房的临终关怀。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Despite international differences in cultural perspectives on end-of-life issues, little is known of the care for the dying in the general wards of acute hospitals in Asia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective medical chart review of all 683 adult patients who died without intensive care unit (ICU) admission in our Singaporean hospital in 2007. We first evaluated the prevalence of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and orders for or against life-sustaining therapies; second, if such orders were discussed with the patients and/or family members; and third, the actual treatments provided before death. RESULTS: There were DNR orders for 66.2% of patients and neither commitment for DNR nor cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for 28.1%. Orders to limit life-sustaining therapies, including ICU admission, intubation, and vasopressors/inotropes were infrequent. Only 6.2% of the alert and conversant patients with DNR orders were involved in discussions on these orders. In contrast, such discussions with their family members occurred 82.9% of the time. Interventions in the last 24 hours of life included CPR (9.4%), intubation (6.4%), vasopressors/inotropes (14.8%), tube feeding (24.7%), and antibiotics (44.9%). Analgesia was provided in 29.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: There was a lack of commitment by doctors on orders for DNR/CPR and to limit life-sustaining therapies, infrequent discussions with patients on end-of-life decisions, and excessive burdensome interventions with inadequate palliative care for the dying. These findings may reflect certain Asian cultural biases. More work is required to improve our quality of end-of-life care.
机译:背景:尽管在国际上对报废问题的文化观点存在分歧,但对于亚洲急诊医院普通病房中临终者的护理知之甚少。方法:我们对2007年在新加坡医院就诊的683名未接受重症监护病房(ICU)死亡的成年患者进行了回顾性医学图表审查。我们首先评估了不进行复苏的DNR指令和反对维持生命的疗法;第二,如果与患者和/或家庭成员讨论了此类命令;第三,死亡前提供的实际治疗方法。结果:有66.2%的患者接受DNR订单,而既不承诺DNR也不接受心肺复苏(CPR)的患者占28.1%。很少有限制生命维持疗法的命令,包括ICU入院,插管和升压药/正性肌力药。仅有6.2%的DNR戒备的警惕和熟悉的患者参与了有关这些戒律的讨论。相反,与家人进行此类讨论的发生率为82.9%。生命最后24小时的干预措施包括CPR(9.4%),插管(6.4%),升压药/肌力药(14.8%),管饲(24.7%)和抗生素(44.9%)。 29.1%的患者使用了镇痛剂。结论:医生对DNR / CPR的命令缺乏承诺,并没有限制其维持生命的疗法,很少与患者讨论生命终止决定,以及过多的沉重干预措施以及对临终者的姑息治疗不足。这些发现可能反映出某些亚洲文化偏见。需要更多的工作来提高我们的临终护理质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号